Neotel (Pty) Ltd v Transtel Telecoms Business (14/LM/Jan08) [2008] ZACT 34 (19 May 2008)
The Tribunal found that the combined market share of Neotel and Transtel in all relevant markets would not exceed 3%, with Telkom remaining the dominant incumbent. The transaction was unlikely to result in any substantial lessening or prevention of competition. Concerns raised by third parties regarding market access and vertical integration were either unfounded or outside the scope of the merger proceedings. The transaction was consistent with government policy to introduce competition in the fixed line telecommunications sector. There were no public interest issues identified. Accordingly, the merger was approved unconditionally.
- Citation
- [2008] ZACT 34
- Parties
- Applicant: Neotel (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Transtel Telecoms Business
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2008
- Case Number
- 14/LM/Jan08
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Clearance / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Merger approved unconditionally; no substantial lessening or prevention of competition found.
- Judges
- N Manoim, M Holden, Y Carrim
- Legal Topics
- Merger Clearance, Market Definition, Vertical Integration, Public Interest, Telecommunications Regulation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Neotel (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Transtel Telecoms Business
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Clearance / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger between Neotel and Transtel Telecoms Business will substantially lessen or prevent competition in any relevant market.
- 2 Whether there are any public interest concerns arising from the transaction.
- 3 Whether third party concerns regarding market access and vertical integration are substantiated.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the combined market share of Neotel and Transtel in all relevant markets would not exceed 3%, with Telkom remaining the dominant incumbent. The transaction was unlikely to result in any substantial lessening or prevention of competition. Concerns raised by third parties regarding market access and vertical integration were either unfounded or outside the scope of the merger proceedings. The transaction was consistent with government policy to introduce competition in the fixed line telecommunications sector. There were no public interest issues identified. Accordingly, the merger was approved unconditionally.
Court Disposition
Merger approved unconditionally; no substantial lessening or prevention of competition found.
Orders
- The merger between Neotel (Pty) Ltd and Transtel Telecoms Business is approved unconditionally.
- No conditions are imposed on the transaction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment