New Model Private College CC v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality (2025/050470) [2025] ZAGPJHC 417 (25 April 2025)

New Model Private College CC v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality (2025/050470) [2025] ZAGPJHC 417 (25 April 2025)

The court found that the application was urgent due to the ongoing impact on children attending the school and the unlawful nature of the electricity termination. The pre-termination notice was partially defective as it included disputed electricity charges, contrary to the requirements of the Municipal Systems Act. The parties agreed that the applicant should be afforded a grace period to settle the corrected arrears, excluding disputed electricity charges, and that electricity supply should be reinstated pending payment or arrangement. The court held that service of the pre-termination notice on the school was sufficient and that the applicant's relief could not be exclusively based on...

Citation
[2025] ZAGPJHC 417
Parties
Applicant: New Model Private College CC; Respondent: City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: City Power (SOC) Limited
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
25 April 2025
Case Number
2025/050470
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Determination
Outcome
Application granted in part; electricity supply to be reinstated subject to payment or arrangement of corrected arrears.
Judges
M V Noko
Legal Topics
Municipal Services Disconnection, Pre Termination Notice, Mandament Van Spolie, Urgent Interdict, Children Rights, Disputed Municipal Billing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

New Model Private College CC

Applicant

City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality

Respondent

City Power (SOC) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Final Determination

  1. 1 Whether the termination of electricity supply without proper pre-termination notice was lawful.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant satisfied the requirements for urgent relief.
  3. 3 Whether the existence of a billing dispute precluded debt collection measures and disconnection.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application was urgent due to the ongoing impact on children attending the school and the unlawful nature of the electricity termination. The pre-termination notice was partially defective as it included disputed electricity charges, contrary to the requirements of the Municipal Systems Act. The parties agreed that the applicant should be afforded a grace period to settle the corrected arrears, excluding disputed electricity charges, and that electricity supply should be reinstated pending payment or arrangement. The court held that service of the pre-termination notice on the school was sufficient and that the applicant's relief could not be exclusively based on...

Court Disposition

Application granted in part; electricity supply to be reinstated subject to payment or arrangement of corrected arrears.

Orders

  • The applicant’s non-compliance with rules and practice directives relating to service and time periods is condoned; the application is heard as urgent.
  • The respondent is ordered to deduct electricity charges from the pre-termination notice and afford the applicant 14 days to pay or arrange payment of the remaining amount due in accordance with respondent’s policies.