New Model Private College CC v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality (2025/050470) [2025] ZAGPJHC 417 (25 April 2025)
The court found that the application was urgent due to the ongoing impact on children attending the school and the unlawful nature of the electricity termination. The pre-termination notice was partially defective as it included disputed electricity charges, contrary to the requirements of the Municipal Systems Act. The parties agreed that the applicant should be afforded a grace period to settle the corrected arrears, excluding disputed electricity charges, and that electricity supply should be reinstated pending payment or arrangement. The court held that service of the pre-termination notice on the school was sufficient and that the applicant's relief could not be exclusively based on...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPJHC 417
- Parties
- Applicant: New Model Private College CC; Respondent: City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: City Power (SOC) Limited
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2025
- Case Number
- 2025/050470
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; electricity supply to be reinstated subject to payment or arrangement of corrected arrears.
- Judges
- M V Noko
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Services Disconnection, Pre Termination Notice, Mandament Van Spolie, Urgent Interdict, Children Rights, Disputed Municipal Billing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
New Model Private College CC
Applicant
City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
City Power (SOC) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of electricity supply without proper pre-termination notice was lawful.
- 2 Whether the applicant satisfied the requirements for urgent relief.
- 3 Whether the existence of a billing dispute precluded debt collection measures and disconnection.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application was urgent due to the ongoing impact on children attending the school and the unlawful nature of the electricity termination. The pre-termination notice was partially defective as it included disputed electricity charges, contrary to the requirements of the Municipal Systems Act. The parties agreed that the applicant should be afforded a grace period to settle the corrected arrears, excluding disputed electricity charges, and that electricity supply should be reinstated pending payment or arrangement. The court held that service of the pre-termination notice on the school was sufficient and that the applicant's relief could not be exclusively based on...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; electricity supply to be reinstated subject to payment or arrangement of corrected arrears.
Orders
- The applicant’s non-compliance with rules and practice directives relating to service and time periods is condoned; the application is heard as urgent.
- The respondent is ordered to deduct electricity charges from the pre-termination notice and afford the applicant 14 days to pay or arrange payment of the remaining amount due in accordance with respondent’s policies.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment