Newcastle Local Municipality v SAMWU and Others (D448/2014) [2014] ZALCD 36 (12 August 2014)
The court found that the real issue in dispute was a demand for salary increases to narrow the wage gap between employees, which constitutes a wages and salaries matter. The collective agreement binding the parties prescribes that all bargaining on wages and salaries must occur at national level within the bargaining council. The first respondent's attempt to pursue workplace-level bargaining and strike action on this issue is prohibited by section 65(3)(a) of the LRA. The certificate of failure to settle issued by the third respondent does not affect the legality of the strike, as the right to strike accrues upon the expiry of 30 days from referral, regardless of the certificate's...
- Citation
- [2014] ZALCD 36
- Parties
- Applicant: Newcastle Local Municipality; Respondent: SAMWU; Respondent: South African Local Government Bargaining Council; Respondent: Ian Bulose N.O.
- Court
- Labour Court Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2014
- Case Number
- D448/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Return Date on Rule Nisi; Final Interdict Sought
- Outcome
- The rule nisi is confirmed to the extent specified; the proposed strike is declared unprotected; the application to review the certificate of failure to settle is dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Snyman
- Legal Topics
- Protected Strike, Collective Bargaining, Centralised Bargaining, Section 65 Lra, Interdict, Certificate of Failure to Settle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Newcastle Local Municipality
Applicant
SAMWU
Respondent
South African Local Government Bargaining Council
Respondent
Ian Bulose N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Return Date on Rule Nisi; Final Interdict Sought
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed strike by the first respondent and its members is protected or unprotected under the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the issue in dispute concerns wages and salaries regulated by a collective agreement requiring national level bargaining.
- 3 Whether the certificate of failure to settle issued by the third respondent should be reviewed and set aside.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the real issue in dispute was a demand for salary increases to narrow the wage gap between employees, which constitutes a wages and salaries matter. The collective agreement binding the parties prescribes that all bargaining on wages and salaries must occur at national level within the bargaining council. The first respondent's attempt to pursue workplace-level bargaining and strike action on this issue is prohibited by section 65(3)(a) of the LRA. The certificate of failure to settle issued by the third respondent does not affect the legality of the strike, as the right to strike accrues upon the expiry of 30 days from referral, regardless of the certificate's...
Court Disposition
The rule nisi is confirmed to the extent specified; the proposed strike is declared unprotected; the application to review the certificate of failure to settle is dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The rule nisi issued on 21 May 2014 is confirmed only to the extent specified in this order.
- Any strike action to be embarked upon or contemplated by the first respondent and its members in terms of the dispute referred to the second respondent on 22 April 2014 under case number KPD041413 is declared to constitute unprotected strike action as contemplated by section 68(1) of the Labour Relations Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment