Ngonyama N.O. and Others v Eyabantu Capital Consortium (PTY ) Ltd and Others (18790-2020) [2022] ZAGPJHC 852 (30 September 2022)
The court found that the order suspending the operation of the default judgments and postponing the contempt proceedings disposed of a substantial part of the relief sought in the contempt application. The court held that the matter had not become moot, as contempt of court is a permanent issue and court orders must...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] ZAGPJHC 852
- Parties
- Applicant: Qhawe Hlomele Ngonyama N.O.; Applicant: Khanya Malungelo Ngonyama N.O.; Applicant: Nokwazizwelela Ngonyama N.O.; Applicant: Lulama Smuts Ngonyama; Respondent: Eyabantu Capital Consortium (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Thabo Sindisa Kwinana; Respondent: Thabo Sindisa Kwinana N.O.; Respondent: Zolisile Mtetelel Mapipa N.O.
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2022
- Case Number
- 18790-2020
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Order Suspending Operation of Default Judgments and Postponing Contempt Proceedings.
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted to a Full Bench.
- Judges
- H S Coetzee
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Interlocutory Orders, Contempt of Court, Joinder, Suspension of Judgment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Qhawe Hlomele Ngonyama N.O.
Applicant
Khanya Malungelo Ngonyama N.O.
Applicant
Nokwazizwelela Ngonyama N.O.
Applicant
Lulama Smuts Ngonyama
Applicant
Eyabantu Capital Consortium (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Thabo Sindisa Kwinana
Respondent
Thabo Sindisa Kwinana N.O.
Respondent
Zolisile Mtetelel Mapipa N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Order Suspending Operation of Default Judgments and Postponing Contempt Proceedings.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order suspending the operation of default judgments and postponing contempt proceedings is final and appealable.
- 2 Whether the matter has become moot due to subsequent proceedings.
- 3 Whether the applicants have reasonable prospects of success on appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the order suspending the operation of the default judgments and postponing the contempt proceedings disposed of a substantial part of the relief sought in the contempt application. The court held that the matter had not become moot, as contempt of court is a permanent issue and court orders must always be obeyed. The court determined that the applicants had reasonable prospects of success on appeal, particularly given the failure to have sufficient regard to the finality of the contempt application. In the interests of justice, leave to appeal should be granted to a Full Bench for reconsideration of the order suspending the judgments and granting the respondents leave...
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted to a Full Bench.
Orders
- The applicants are granted leave to appeal the order of 20 November 2020 to a Full Bench.
- The costs of the application for leave to appeal are costs in the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment