Ngqwebo v Mhana and Others (3277/09) [2010] ZAECGHC 84 (5 August 2010)
The court found that the applicant was wrongfully removed as a councillor, as the withdrawal of his name by the party did not constitute a lawful ground for removal under the Municipal Structures Act. Once appointed, a councillor ceases to be a candidate on the party list and cannot be recalled by the party except in the circumstances set out in sections 26 and 27 of the Act. The actions of the first, second, and third respondents in declaring a vacancy and appointing the fourth respondent were unlawful for want of compliance with the Act. The Municipal Manager and Chief Electoral Officer must only act when a councillor has lawfully ceased to hold office. The applicant was entitled to...
- Citation
- [2010] ZAECGHC 84
- Parties
- Applicant: Fikile Ngqwebo; Respondent: Makhaya Mhana; Respondent: Mlamli Bongco; Respondent: Bongani B Finca; Respondent: Xolani Madlungu; Respondent: L Mphlenza
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 August 2010
- Case Number
- 3277/09
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; the applicant is reinstated as councillor and the declaration of vacancy and appointment of the fourth respondent are set aside.
- Judges
- M Makaula
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Structures Act, Proportional Representation, Vacancy in Council, Unlawful Removal, Joinder, Review of Administrative Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fikile Ngqwebo
Applicant
Makhaya Mhana
Respondent
Mlamli Bongco
Respondent
Bongani B Finca
Respondent
Xolani Madlungu
Respondent
L Mphlenza
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was lawfully removed as a councillor from the Nxuba Municipal Council.
- 2 Whether the declaration of a vacancy and appointment of the fourth respondent was valid under the Municipal Structures Act.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to reinstatement and associated benefits.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was wrongfully removed as a councillor, as the withdrawal of his name by the party did not constitute a lawful ground for removal under the Municipal Structures Act. Once appointed, a councillor ceases to be a candidate on the party list and cannot be recalled by the party except in the circumstances set out in sections 26 and 27 of the Act. The actions of the first, second, and third respondents in declaring a vacancy and appointing the fourth respondent were unlawful for want of compliance with the Act. The Municipal Manager and Chief Electoral Officer must only act when a councillor has lawfully ceased to hold office. The applicant was entitled to...
Court Disposition
Application granted; the applicant is reinstated as councillor and the declaration of vacancy and appointment of the fourth respondent are set aside.
Orders
- The declaration of a vacancy and replacement of the applicant as councillor are reviewed and set aside.
- The applicant is immediately reinstated as councillor of the Nxuba Municipal Council as the duly elected representative of BERA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment