Ngubane v Road Accident Fund (2020/20008) [2022] ZAGPJHC 275; 2022 (5) SA 231 (GJ) (26 April 2022)
The court held that, in terms of established Supreme Court of Appeal authority and the common law, a claim for general damages does not transfer to a deceased estate unless litis contestatio has been reached, which is generally the close of pleadings. In this case, the defendant never entered an appearance, pleadings never closed, and litis contestatio was not reached before the plaintiff's death. The majority approach in Nkala, which developed the common law to allow transmissibility of general damages prior to litis contestatio, was found not to be binding outside the specific context of class actions and has not been universally accepted. The court preferred the minority's cautionary...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAGPJHC 275
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Simphiwe Bongayiphi Ngubane; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2022
- Case Number
- 2020/20008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Default Judgment Application; Post Substitution of Deceased Plaintiff by Executor; Settlement Attempted But Refused; Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for general damages dismissed; defendant liable for 100% of proven damages in respect of injuries sustained by the deceased; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- C E Thompson
- Legal Topics
- Transmissibility of General Damages, Road Accident Fund Act, Default Judgment, Litis Contestatio, Development of Common Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simphiwe Bongayiphi Ngubane
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Default Judgment Application; Post Substitution of Deceased Plaintiff by Executor; Settlement Attempted But Refused; Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Does a claim for general damages arising from a motor vehicle accident transfer to the deceased estate if the plaintiff dies before litis contestatio is reached.
- 2 Is the majority approach in Nkala v Harmony Gold Mining Company, which developed the common law on transmissibility of general damages, binding in general claims outside class actions.
- 3 Has the common law been properly developed to allow transmissibility of general damages claims prior to litis contestatio.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, in terms of established Supreme Court of Appeal authority and the common law, a claim for general damages does not transfer to a deceased estate unless litis contestatio has been reached, which is generally the close of pleadings. In this case, the defendant never entered an appearance, pleadings never closed, and litis contestatio was not reached before the plaintiff's death. The majority approach in Nkala, which developed the common law to allow transmissibility of general damages prior to litis contestatio, was found not to be binding outside the specific context of class actions and has not been universally accepted. The court preferred the minority's cautionary...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for general damages dismissed; defendant liable for 100% of proven damages in respect of injuries sustained by the deceased; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The Defendant is liable for 100% of the proven damages in respect of the injuries sustained by the Deceased.
- The Plaintiff's claim for general damages, being the only head of damages, is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment