Nkosi v ABSA Bank Limited and Others (73147/2013, 61861/2011) [2014] ZAGPPHC 1021 (9 December 2014)
The court found that the applicants failed to show good cause for rescission of the default judgments. Their explanations for delay were inadequate, and their founding affidavits consisted almost entirely of legal argument with no material facts supporting their defences. The applicants admitted their indebtedness and arrears, and the service of summons and Section 129 notices was properly effected. The cited constitutional and statutory provisions did not apply on the facts, and the applicants did not demonstrate any irregularity or non-compliance by the respondents. The applications were repetitive, generic, and appeared to be copied from previous unsuccessful applications, indicating a...
- Citation
- [2014] ZAGPPHC 1021
- Parties
- Applicant: Paulos Christiaan Nkosi; Applicant: Ivailo Ivanov; Respondent: ABSA Bank Limited; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds, Pretoria; Respondent: Sheriff of the High Court, Evander, Mpumalanga; Respondent: Andrew James; Respondent: Sheriff of the High Court Tshwane South East
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 2014
- Case Number
- 73147/2013, 61861/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Rescission Application / Opposed Motion Court; Application for Rescission of Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Applications for rescission by both applicants are dismissed with costs. Determination of the scale and order of costs is postponed sine die, pending further application.
- Judges
- S Strauss
- Legal Topics
- Rescission of Default Judgment, Condonation, Special Execution of Primary Residence, National Credit Act Compliance, Section 26 Constitution, Attorney and Client Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paulos Christiaan Nkosi
Applicant
Ivailo Ivanov
Applicant
ABSA Bank Limited
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds, Pretoria
Respondent
Sheriff of the High Court, Evander, Mpumalanga
Respondent
Andrew James
Respondent
Sheriff of the High Court Tshwane South East
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rescission Application / Opposed Motion Court; Application for Rescission of Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have shown good cause for rescission of default judgment.
- 2 Whether the applicants have provided a reasonable explanation for their default and delay.
- 3 Whether the applicants have established bona fide defences with prospects of success.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants failed to show good cause for rescission of the default judgments. Their explanations for delay were inadequate, and their founding affidavits consisted almost entirely of legal argument with no material facts supporting their defences. The applicants admitted their indebtedness and arrears, and the service of summons and Section 129 notices was properly effected. The cited constitutional and statutory provisions did not apply on the facts, and the applicants did not demonstrate any irregularity or non-compliance by the respondents. The applications were repetitive, generic, and appeared to be copied from previous unsuccessful applications, indicating a...
Court Disposition
Applications for rescission by both applicants are dismissed with costs. Determination of the scale and order of costs is postponed sine die, pending further application.
Orders
- The applications for rescission of both applicants are dismissed with costs.
- The scale and order of costs are postponed sine die, to be enrolled by way of motion as set out in prayers 3-7.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment