Nkosi v Minister of Police (31446/2015) [2019] ZAGPJHC 285 (22 August 2019)

Nkosi v Minister of Police (31446/2015) [2019] ZAGPJHC 285 (22 August 2019)

The court found the plaintiff suffered severe and permanent injury to his right arm as a result of unlawful police conduct. The expert evidence established the extent of physical and psychological harm, including permanent loss of function, ongoing pain, and social withdrawal. The court rejected the majority of occupational therapy recommendations as unsubstantiated and inflated, allowing only a lump sum for necessary aids. The actuarial calculations provided by the defendant were preferred for future medical expenses and loss of earning capacity, with a globular 10% contingency deduction applied. The plaintiff's career prospects within the SABC were not diminished by the injury, but his...

Citation
[2019] ZAGPJHC 285
Parties
Plaintiff: Mduduzi Nkosi; Defendant: Minister of Police
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
22 August 2019
Case Number
31446/2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant liable for damages as specified.
Judges
Sutherland
Legal Topics
Unlawful Shooting, Personal Injury, Quantum of Damages, Loss of Earning Capacity, Future Medical Expenses, General Damages
Delict Unlawful Shooting Personal Injury Quantum of Damages Loss of Earning Capacity Future Medical Expenses General Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mduduzi Nkosi

Plaintiff

Minister of Police

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for the plaintiff's unlawful shooting and resultant permanent injury.
  2. 2 Are all occupational therapy recommendations necessary and substantiated.
  3. 3 What contingency deductions should be applied to future medical expenses and loss of earning capacity.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the plaintiff suffered severe and permanent injury to his right arm as a result of unlawful police conduct. The expert evidence established the extent of physical and psychological harm, including permanent loss of function, ongoing pain, and social withdrawal. The court rejected the majority of occupational therapy recommendations as unsubstantiated and inflated, allowing only a lump sum for necessary aids. The actuarial calculations provided by the defendant were preferred for future medical expenses and loss of earning capacity, with a globular 10% contingency deduction applied. The plaintiff's career prospects within the SABC were not diminished by the injury, but his...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant liable for damages as specified.

Orders

  • The defendant shall pay the plaintiff R4,309,000 within 30 days of the judgment date.
  • Should payment not be made within 30 days, the amount will bear interest at 10.5% per annum from 30 days after the order to date of final payment.