Nkotobe and Others v Bengu and Others (580/2014) [2015] ZAECBHC 12 (15 May 2015)

Nkotobe and Others v Bengu and Others (580/2014) [2015] ZAECBHC 12 (15 May 2015)

The court held that the applicants, as persons who have not applied or been selected as beneficiaries, lack the necessary locus standi to seek the removal of trustees under section 20(1) of the Trust Property Control Act. Their interest is limited to the right to apply for beneficiary status, not in the administration of the trust property. The court further found that even if locus standi were established, the applicants failed to show that removal of the trustees would be in the interests of the trust and its beneficiaries, especially as less drastic remedies are available. The failure to convene meetings was attributed to an ongoing dispute, not a lack of diligence or care by the...

Citation
[2015] ZAECBHC 12
Parties
Applicant: Ratasi Gladys Nkotobe; Applicant: Vuyiswa Ntozini; Applicant: Neliswa Regina Quza; Applicant: Xolani Wellington Banku; Applicant: Mzwandile Witness Bako; Applicant: Asanda Bensthumani; Applicant: Sipho Alex Hanise; Respondent: Mfanelo Wright Bengu; Respondent: Thuliswa Moreen Dyani; Respondent: Ntombothando Kila; Respondent: Mphumzi Rumsell Xonxa; Respondent: The Master of the High Court; Respondent: Mabhongo Phillip Buwa
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Bhisho
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
15 May 2015
Case Number
580/2014
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Removal of Trustees Under Section 20(1) of the Trust Property Control Act
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Judges
D Van Zyl
Legal Topics
Trust Property Control Act, Removal of Trustees, Locus Standi, Fiduciary Duties
Land and Property Civil Procedure Trust Property Control Act Removal of Trustees Locus Standi Fiduciary Duties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ratasi Gladys Nkotobe

Applicant

Vuyiswa Ntozini

Applicant

Neliswa Regina Quza

Applicant

Xolani Wellington Banku

Applicant

Mzwandile Witness Bako

Applicant

Asanda Bensthumani

Applicant

Sipho Alex Hanise

Applicant

Mfanelo Wright Bengu

Respondent

Thuliswa Moreen Dyani

Respondent

Ntombothando Kila

Respondent

Mphumzi Rumsell Xonxa

Respondent

The Master of the High Court

Respondent

Mabhongo Phillip Buwa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application for Removal of Trustees Under Section 20(1) of the Trust Property Control Act

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Do the applicants have locus standi to seek the removal of the trustees under section 20(1) of the Trust Property Control Act?
  2. 2 Is the removal of the trustees in the interests of the trust and its beneficiaries?
  3. 3 Are there less drastic remedies available to the applicants than removal of trustees?

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the applicants, as persons who have not applied or been selected as beneficiaries, lack the necessary locus standi to seek the removal of trustees under section 20(1) of the Trust Property Control Act. Their interest is limited to the right to apply for beneficiary status, not in the administration of the trust property. The court further found that even if locus standi were established, the applicants failed to show that removal of the trustees would be in the interests of the trust and its beneficiaries, especially as less drastic remedies are available. The failure to convene meetings was attributed to an ongoing dispute, not a lack of diligence or care by the...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for removal of trustees is dismissed.
  • The applicants are ordered to pay the costs of the application.