Nkqubela Farmers Co-Operatives and Another v Gonya and Others (490/96) [1997] ZAECHC 10 (26 February 1997)

Nkqubela Farmers Co-Operatives and Another v Gonya and Others (490/96) [1997] ZAECHC 10 (26 February 1997)

The court held that a spoliation order may be granted in respect of an incorporeal right, such as the right to collect milk arising from a contract, provided the applicant has been deprived of that right. The validity of the underlying contract is not relevant to the granting of the spoliation order. Since the respondents conceded that the applicants were deprived of their right to collect milk from Unit 3 Dairy Parlour, the applicants were entitled to restoration of that right. The applicants were also entitled to restoration of their rights to use the cattle feed facility and other premises, except for Unit 3 Dairy Parlour, which was excluded from the order as the applicants had not...

Citation
[1997] ZAECHC 10
Parties
Applicant: Nkqubela Farmers' Co-Operative; Applicant: Jackson Mantile; Respondent: Elliot Gonya & 81 Others
Court
High Courts - Eastern Cape
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
26 February 1997
Case Number
490/96
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Return Date for Confirmation of Rule Nisi
Outcome
Rule Nisi confirmed in respect of the applicants' rights, with exclusion of Unit 3 Dairy Parlour; no order as to costs.
Judges
Y Ebrahim
Legal Topics
Spoliation Order, Incorporeal Rights, Restoration of Possession
Civil Procedure Spoliation Order Incorporeal Rights Restoration of Possession

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nkqubela Farmers' Co-Operative

Applicant

Jackson Mantile

Applicant

Elliot Gonya & 81 Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Return Date for Confirmation of Rule Nisi

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a spoliation order can be granted in respect of an incorporeal right arising from a contract.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants were deprived of their right to collect milk from Unit 3 Dairy Parlour.
  3. 3 Whether restoration of possession should be ordered despite the validity of the underlying contract being disputed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that a spoliation order may be granted in respect of an incorporeal right, such as the right to collect milk arising from a contract, provided the applicant has been deprived of that right. The validity of the underlying contract is not relevant to the granting of the spoliation order. Since the respondents conceded that the applicants were deprived of their right to collect milk from Unit 3 Dairy Parlour, the applicants were entitled to restoration of that right. The applicants were also entitled to restoration of their rights to use the cattle feed facility and other premises, except for Unit 3 Dairy Parlour, which was excluded from the order as the applicants had not...

Court Disposition

Rule Nisi confirmed in respect of the applicants' rights, with exclusion of Unit 3 Dairy Parlour; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Paragraphs 2.1 to 2.8 of the applicants' Notice of Motion, forming part of the Rule Nisi issued on 11 November 1996, are confirmed.
  • The premises cited in paragraph 2.5 do not incorporate Unit 3 Dairy Parlour.