N.M obo L.N.M v MEC For Health, Eastern Cape Provincial Government (315/2018) [2022] ZAECBHC 48 (26 July 2022)
The court found that the applicant only acquired knowledge of the facts giving rise to the claim and the identity of the debtor upon receipt of the medical specialist's report on 27 June 2017. The statutory notice was sent less than three months out of time, and the delay was attributable to the applicant's youth, rural circumstances, funding constraints, lack of medical and legal knowledge, and attorney oversight. The respondent failed to demonstrate any unreasonable prejudice resulting from the delay or from the notice being sent to the Department of Health rather than the Head of Department. The interests of justice, the minor status of the child, and the constitutional right of access...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAECBHC 48
- Parties
- Applicant: N.M obo L.N.M; Respondent: MEC For Health, Eastern Cape Provincial Government
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Bhisho
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2022
- Case Number
- 315/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Condonation Application / Application for Condonation of Non Compliance With Statutory Notice Requirements Prior to Institution of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Condonation granted for the applicant's non-compliance with sections 3(1) and 3(2) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act 40 of 2002; leave granted to file supplementary affidavit; costs made costs in the cause of the main action.
- Judges
- Laing
- Legal Topics
- Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Organs of State Act, Condonation, Medical Negligence, Prescription, Notice Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N.M obo L.N.M
Applicant
MEC For Health, Eastern Cape Provincial Government
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Condonation Application / Application for Condonation of Non Compliance With Statutory Notice Requirements Prior to Institution of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's non-compliance with sections 3(1) and 3(2) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act 40 of 2002 should be condoned.
- 2 When the debt became due for purposes of statutory notice and prescription.
- 3 Whether good cause exists for the failure to give timeous notice and whether the respondent was unreasonably prejudiced by the delay.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant only acquired knowledge of the facts giving rise to the claim and the identity of the debtor upon receipt of the medical specialist's report on 27 June 2017. The statutory notice was sent less than three months out of time, and the delay was attributable to the applicant's youth, rural circumstances, funding constraints, lack of medical and legal knowledge, and attorney oversight. The respondent failed to demonstrate any unreasonable prejudice resulting from the delay or from the notice being sent to the Department of Health rather than the Head of Department. The interests of justice, the minor status of the child, and the constitutional right of access...
Court Disposition
Condonation granted for the applicant's non-compliance with sections 3(1) and 3(2) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act 40 of 2002; leave granted to file supplementary affidavit; costs made costs in the cause of the main action.
Orders
- The applicant is given leave to file her supplementary affidavit dated 7 June 2021.
- The applicant's non-compliance with sections 3(1) and 3(2) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act 40 of 2002 is condoned.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment