N.N and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (EL1252/2020) [2022] ZAECELLC 26 (20 September 2022)
The court found that the applicants' minor children, not being South African citizens or holders of permanent residency permits, are not entitled to birth certificates with unique identity numbers under the relevant legislation. The process requires that the child's birth be registered in the country of citizenship, after which an application for permanent residency may be made. Only upon the granting of permanent residency can an identity number be assigned. The identity number previously issued to the first child was found to be unlawful and contrary to statutory requirements, as the child did not hold permanent residency. The court granted exemption from exhausting internal remedies...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAECELLC 26
- Parties
- Applicant: N[....]1 N[....]2; Applicant: G[....]1 O[....] G[....]2 N[....]2; Respondent: Minister of Home Affairs; Respondent: Director-General, Home Affairs
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, East London Local Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2022
- Case Number
- EL1252/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Main application dismissed with costs; counter-application granted, identity number issued to first child declared unlawful and set aside; no costs order in respect of the counter-application.
- Judges
- N G Beshe
- Legal Topics
- Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Birth Registration, Identity Numbers, Permanent Residency, Best Interests of Child
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N[....]1 N[....]2
Applicant
G[....]1 O[....] G[....]2 N[....]2
Applicant
Minister of Home Affairs
Respondent
Director-General, Home Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' minor child, born in South Africa to Zimbabwean parents, is entitled to a birth certificate with a unique identity number.
- 2 Whether the applicants should be exempted from exhausting internal remedies under section 7(2)(c) of PAJA.
- 3 Whether the identity number issued to the applicants' first child was lawful and should be reviewed and set aside.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants' minor children, not being South African citizens or holders of permanent residency permits, are not entitled to birth certificates with unique identity numbers under the relevant legislation. The process requires that the child's birth be registered in the country of citizenship, after which an application for permanent residency may be made. Only upon the granting of permanent residency can an identity number be assigned. The identity number previously issued to the first child was found to be unlawful and contrary to statutory requirements, as the child did not hold permanent residency. The court granted exemption from exhausting internal remedies...
Court Disposition
Main application dismissed with costs; counter-application granted, identity number issued to first child declared unlawful and set aside; no costs order in respect of the counter-application.
Orders
- The main application is dismissed with costs.
- It is declared that the identity number issued to N[....]3 E[....] N[....]2 on 7 June 2014 was issued unlawfully.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment