Northam Platinum Holdings Limited v Northam Platinum Limited (LM024May21) [2021] ZACT 31 (12 July 2021)
- Citation
- [2021] ZACT 31
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Mondo Mazwai, Andreas Wessels, Imraan Valodia
- Case number
- LM024May21
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Mondo Mazwai, Andreas Wessels, Imraan Valodia
- Case number
- LM024May21
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger is an internal restructure within the Northam group, designed to unwind the existing BEE structure and implement a new one, resulting in a net increase in HDP ownership. The Commission's investigation revealed no accretion in market shares in the global markets for platinum, palladium, rhodium, or gold, and the merged entity would remain constrained by other major competitors. The merger would not result in retrenchments or job losses, nor would it affect mining rights or Social Labour Plans. No third party raised concerns. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition or negatively impact the public interest.
Court disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
Orders
- The large merger between Northam Platinum Holdings Limited and Northam Platinum Limited is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
Northam Platinum Holdings Limited
Applicant Counsel: R WilsonNortham Platinum Limited
Respondent Counsel: L MakhubeduAmounts and remedies
- Post Merger Market Share (platinum): 6
- Post Merger Market Share (palladium): 3
- Post Merger Market Share (rhodium): 7
- Post Merger Market Share (gold): 0.01
- HDP Ownership Stake Pre Merger (%): 31.4
- HDP Ownership Stake Post Merger (%): 32.2
03
Procedural history
Posture
Large Merger / Merger Approval
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed merger would substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Whether the merger would have a negative impact on public interest, including employment and ownership spread.
- 03
Whether the transaction would affect mining rights or Social Labour Plans.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The merging parties argued that the transaction is an internal group restructure to unwind the existing BEE ownership and implement a new BEE structure. They asserted that the merger would not result in any change in market structure or accretion of market shares, would not affect employment, and would promote a greater spread of ownership among HDPs, employees, and communities.
- Respondent
- The Competition Commission submitted that there are horizontal overlaps in the global markets for platinum, palladium, rhodium, and gold, but the merger would not result in any accretion in market shares or change in market structure. The merged entity would remain constrained by other major competitors. The Commission found no adverse effects on employment, mining rights, or Social Labour Plans, and no public interest concerns.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, or if it has a negative impact on public interest factors.
- 02
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
Public interest considerations include the effect of the merger on employment, the ability of small businesses to compete, and the spread of ownership, particularly among historically disadvantaged persons.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger is an internal restructure within the Northam group, designed to unwind the existing BEE structure and implement a new one, resulting in a net increase in HDP ownership. The Commission's investigation revealed no accretion in market shares in the global markets for platinum, palladium, rhodium, or gold, and the merged entity would remain constrained by other major competitors. The merger would not result in retrenchments or job losses, nor would it affect mining rights or Social Labour Plans. No third party raised concerns. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition or negatively impact the public interest.
Obiter and limits
- The transaction promotes a greater spread of ownership by facilitating increased participation by employees, communities, and HDPs in the Northam Group.
- No mining rights or Social Labour Plans will be transferred as a result of the merger, ensuring continuity in Northam's obligations.
- The unconditional approval reflects the absence of competition or public interest concerns.
Court disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
- The large merger between Northam Platinum Holdings Limited and Northam Platinum Limited is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case no: LM024May21
Northam Platinum Holdings Limited (Primary Acquiring Firm)
and
Northam Platinum Limited (Primary Target Firm)
REASONS FOR
DECISION
[1] On 2 July 2021, the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a large merger between Northam Platinum Holdings Limited (âNortham Holdingsâ) and Northam Platinum Limited (âNorthamâ).
[2] Northam Holdings is a newly incorporated entity, wholly controlled by Northam. The transaction is essentially a restructure within the group to unwind Northamâs existing Black Economic Empowerment (âBEEâ) ownership and implement a new BEE structure.[1] Post-merger, Northam will become a subsidiary of Northam Holdings. Northam Holdings will acquire direct control over Northam and will be listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (âJSEâ). Northam will be delisted from the JSE.
[3] Northam is a primary producer of three platinum group metals: platinum, palladium and rhodium as well as gold.[2] Northamâs primary customers are the motor manufacturing, jewellery and other industries.
[4] Northam is not controlled by any one firm and wholly owns five firms in South Africa. Northam also holds a single âNâ share in Zambezi Platinum (RF) (Pty) Ltd (âZambeziâ) as a protective right.
[5] The Competition Commission (âCommissionâ) found horizontal overlaps in the global markets for the mining and production of the following four metals, and concluded that the proposed merger does not result in an accretion in market shares, or a change in the structure of the market, as indicated below:
Global markets for the mining and production of: Accretion Post-merger market share Platinum None ± 6% Palladium None ± 3% Rhodium None ± 7% Gold None ± 0.01%
[6] In respect of the platinum, palladium and rhodium markets, the Commission found that the merged entity would remain constrained by other big players such as Anglo Platinum, Impala Platinum and Sibanye-Stillwater. In the gold market, the merged entity would remain constrained by other big players such as Goldfields and AngloGold Ashanti.
[7] The merging parties provided an unequivocal statement that the proposed transaction would have no effect on employment, particularly that it will not result in retrenchments or job losses. The merger also raises no other public interest concerns.
[8] We note that the proposed transaction promotes a greater spread of ownership by facilitating greater participation in the Northam Group by Northam employees, Northam communities and participants of the HDP SPV. This is because the Commission found that the composite transaction will result in a net increase in the ownership stakes of HDPs in the Northam Group from 31.4% to 32.2%.[3] As no mining rights will be transferred, none of Northamâs mineâs Social Labour Plans (SLP) will be transferred. The Commission found that the merger will not impact Northamâs ability to deliver on its SLP objectives.
[9] No third party raised any concerns.
[10] We concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, or to have a negative impact on the public interest.
12 July 2021
Ms Mondo Mazwai Date
Mr Andreas Wessels and Prof. Imraan Valodia concurring
Tribunal Case Manager: P Kumbirai
For the Merging Parties: R Wilson and L Makhubedu of Webber Wentzel
For the Commission: Z Siyo and M Aphane
[1] The transaction is the second component in a composite transaction comprising Components A and B. Component A, accelerates the maturity of the existing BEE ownership transaction for existing HDP shareholders in Zambezi Platinum RF (Pty) Ltd (an entity in which Northamâs BEE interests are held) and unlocks value for these shareholders. Component B entails the implementation of a new vendor- financed BEE ownership structure for Northam, with emphasis on participation by broad-based BEE ownership inter alia by employees and communities.
[2] Northam mines these metals from its Zondereinde mine in the Limpopo Province, and its Booysendal North and South mines in the Mpumalanga Province.
[3] This HDP ownership excludes shareholding by other HDPs already invested in Northam.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.