Northam Taxi Association v Molepo and Others (1428/05) [2005] ZANWHC 86 (18 November 2005)

Northam Taxi Association v Molepo and Others (1428/05) [2005] ZANWHC 86 (18 November 2005)

The court held that the applicant is responsible for the respondents' wasted costs incurred in preparing for the hearing up to the receipt of the fax sent on 16 November 2005. The respondents were entitled to rely on the applicant's communication and were not required to attend court on 17 November 2005....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] ZANWHC 86
Parties
Applicant: Northam Taxi Association; Respondent: N I Molepo; Respondent: T G Mashinini; Respondent: D R Rantsoeu; Respondent: M J Makutu; Respondent: Z M Mofokeng; Respondent: S S Ngolwane
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
1428/05
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Costs Determination After Withdrawal/removal From Roll
Outcome
Applicant ordered to pay respondents' wasted costs for preparation up to receipt of the withdrawal fax.
Judges
A A Landman
Legal Topics
Wasted Costs, Removal From Roll, Notice of Set Down
Civil Procedure Wasted Costs Removal From Roll Notice of Set Down

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Northam Taxi Association

Applicant

N I Molepo

Respondent

T G Mashinini

Respondent

D R Rantsoeu

Respondent

M J Makutu

Respondent

Z M Mofokeng

Respondent

S S Ngolwane

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Costs Determination After Withdrawal/removal From Roll

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is liable for the respondents' wasted costs incurred in preparation for the hearing up to receipt of the withdrawal fax.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents were entitled to rely on the applicant's communication and not attend court on the scheduled date.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the applicant is responsible for the respondents' wasted costs incurred in preparing for the hearing up to the receipt of the fax sent on 16 November 2005. The respondents were entitled to rely on the applicant's communication and were not required to attend court on 17 November 2005. Accordingly, the applicant must pay the respondents' wasted costs for preparation up to the date of notification.

Court Disposition

Applicant ordered to pay respondents' wasted costs for preparation up to receipt of the withdrawal fax.

Orders

  • The applicant is to pay the respondents' wasted costs for preparing for the hearing up to the receipt of the fax of 16 November 2005 by respondents' attorney.