NorthWest Provincial Government and Another v Tswaing Consulting CC and Others (190/05) [2006] ZASCA 108; [2007] 2 All SA 365 (SCA); 2007 (4) SA 452 (SCA) (21 November 2006)
The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the service agreement and arbitration agreement were procured by fraud and were voidable at the instance of the province. The province did not affirm the contract with full knowledge of the fraud and attempted to rescind it, albeit ineffectually. Tswaing failed to provide any evidence that restitution would be unjust, having evaded all material allegations regarding the value of its services. The arbitration agreement, being embedded in a fraud-tainted contract, could not survive rescission. Justice required that the province be afforded restitution, and Tswaing was ordered to repay all amounts received under the contract. The appeal was upheld, and...
- Citation
- [2006] ZASCA 108
- Parties
- Appellant: NorthWest Provincial Government; Appellant: NorthWest Tender Board; Respondent: Tswaing Consulting CC; Respondent: Mangope, Swai Mathaniel; Respondent: Sebakwane, Martin Oleboleng; Respondent: Odame-Takyi, Kweku; Respondent: Van Rooyen, JWC, NO
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2006
- Case Number
- 190/05
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; orders of the High Court set aside; application succeeds with costs, including costs of two counsel and costs of the application for postponement.
- Judges
- Zulman JA, Cameron JA, Nugent JA, Maya JA, Cachalia AJA
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Rescission of Contract, Restitution, Arbitration Agreement, Tender Board Approval
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NorthWest Provincial Government
Appellant
NorthWest Tender Board
Appellant
Tswaing Consulting CC
Respondent
Mangope, Swai Mathaniel
Respondent
Sebakwane, Martin Oleboleng
Respondent
Odame-Takyi, Kweku
Respondent
Van Rooyen, JWC, NO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the service agreement and arbitration agreement were induced by fraud and thus voidable at the instance of the province.
- 2 Whether the province effectively rescinded the contract and was entitled to restitution of payments made to Tswaing.
- 3 Whether the arbitration agreement could survive the rescission of the underlying contract.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the service agreement and arbitration agreement were procured by fraud and were voidable at the instance of the province. The province did not affirm the contract with full knowledge of the fraud and attempted to rescind it, albeit ineffectually. Tswaing failed to provide any evidence that restitution would be unjust, having evaded all material allegations regarding the value of its services. The arbitration agreement, being embedded in a fraud-tainted contract, could not survive rescission. Justice required that the province be afforded restitution, and Tswaing was ordered to repay all amounts received under the contract. The appeal was upheld, and...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; orders of the High Court set aside; application succeeds with costs, including costs of two counsel and costs of the application for postponement.
Orders
- The appeal succeeds with costs, including the costs of two counsel, which are to include the costs of the application for postponement.
- The order of the court below dismissing the application is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment