Nyathi and Others v Tenitor Properties (Pty) Ltd, In re: Tenitor Properties (Pty) Ltd v Nyathi and Others (06579/2015) [2015] ZAGPJHC 115 (9 June 2015)
The court found that the respondent had established exceptional circumstances justifying the execution of the eviction order pending appeal. The appellants' occupation was maintained by violence and a rent boycott, causing the respondent severe financial harm and threatening its continued existence. The respondent's ownership was proven by the title deed and registration, and the appellants failed to raise a bona fide dispute regarding ownership. The huur gaat voor koop rule applied, making the respondent the lawful landlord, and the continued occupation without payment was unjustified. The appellants were not indigent and could afford alternative accommodation. The respondent...
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPJHC 115
- Parties
- Appellant: Nyathi, S [JS Madumo]; Appellant: Ngcobo, B & Others listed in Annexure A; Respondent: Tenitor Properties (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 June 2015
- Case Number
- 06579/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order Under S.18(3) of the Superior Courts Act
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- SE Weiner, WHG van der Linde, Klein
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Exceptional Circumstances, Suspension of Order Pending Appeal, Ownership of Immovable Property, Huur Gaat Voor Koop, Irreparable Harm
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nyathi, S [JS Madumo]
Appellant
Ngcobo, B & Others listed in Annexure A
Appellant
Tenitor Properties (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order Under S.18(3) of the Superior Courts Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether exceptional circumstances exist to justify the execution of the eviction order pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the respondent will suffer irreparable harm if the eviction order is suspended.
- 3 Whether the appellants will suffer irreparable harm if the eviction order is executed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent had established exceptional circumstances justifying the execution of the eviction order pending appeal. The appellants' occupation was maintained by violence and a rent boycott, causing the respondent severe financial harm and threatening its continued existence. The respondent's ownership was proven by the title deed and registration, and the appellants failed to raise a bona fide dispute regarding ownership. The huur gaat voor koop rule applied, making the respondent the lawful landlord, and the continued occupation without payment was unjustified. The appellants were not indigent and could afford alternative accommodation. The respondent...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
- The order of Twala, AJ is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment