Nyman v Engelbrecht (C326/01) [2002] ZALC 91 (1 November 2002)
The application to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed because the arbitrator, whose jurisdiction was challenged and whose award was sought to be set aside, was not joined as a party to the proceedings. The court held that the application was defective for non-joinder and could not be entertained. The substantive jurisdictional issue was therefore not decided.
- Citation
- [2002] ZALC 91
- Parties
- Applicant: L NYMAN; Respondent: J ENGELBRECHT
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 November 2002
- Case Number
- C326/01
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed due to non-joinder of the arbitrator.
- Judges
- Revelas
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Ccma, Review of Arbitration Award, Operational Requirements Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L NYMAN
Applicant
J ENGELBRECHT
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction to arbitrate a dispute concerning dismissal for operational requirements.
- 2 Whether the application to set aside the arbitration award is defective due to non-joinder of the arbitrator.
Ratio Decidendi
The application to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed because the arbitrator, whose jurisdiction was challenged and whose award was sought to be set aside, was not joined as a party to the proceedings. The court held that the application was defective for non-joinder and could not be entertained. The substantive jurisdictional issue was therefore not decided.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed due to non-joinder of the arbitrator.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment