N.Z v Member of the Executive Council for Health - Western Cape (Leave to Appeal) (8734/2017) [2025] ZAWCHC 290 (15 July 2025)

N.Z v Member of the Executive Council for Health - Western Cape (Leave to Appeal) (8734/2017) [2025] ZAWCHC 290 (15 July 2025)

The court found that the defendant failed to establish reasonable prospects of success on appeal or any compelling reason for the appeal to be entertained. The grounds advanced were not new and had already been considered in the main judgment. The defendant did not provide a comprehensive account of the critical eight minutes during childbirth, and the evidence, including expert testimony, supported the finding of negligence. The authorities cited by the defendant did not alter the test for leave to appeal, and no discrete issue of public importance or important question of law was raised. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against the...

Citation
[2025] ZAWCHC 290
Parties
Applicant: N[...] Z[...]; Respondent: Member of the Executive Council for Health - Western Cape
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
15 July 2025
Case Number
8734/2017
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment in Favour of Plaintiff
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed; costs awarded against the defendant.
Judges
R K Parker
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Test, Medical Negligence, Costs Order, Superior Courts Act, Expert Evidence
Civil Procedure Delict Leave to Appeal Test Medical Negligence Costs Order Superior Courts Act Expert Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

N[...] Z[...]

Applicant

Member of the Executive Council for Health - Western Cape

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment in Favour of Plaintiff

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal meets the threshold under section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act.
  2. 2 Whether there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal.
  3. 3 Whether there are compelling reasons for the appeal to be heard.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant failed to establish reasonable prospects of success on appeal or any compelling reason for the appeal to be entertained. The grounds advanced were not new and had already been considered in the main judgment. The defendant did not provide a comprehensive account of the critical eight minutes during childbirth, and the evidence, including expert testimony, supported the finding of negligence. The authorities cited by the defendant did not alter the test for leave to appeal, and no discrete issue of public importance or important question of law was raised. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against the...

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed; costs awarded against the defendant.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
  • The defendant shall bear the costs of the application on a party and party scale, including the costs of counsel where so employed on Scale C for Senior Counsel and Scale B for Junior Counsel, where so employed.