Nzimande and Another v Nzimande and Others (24490/12) [2012] ZAGPJHC 223 (11 September 2012)
The court found that the applicants, as dependants listed on the certificate of occupation, had a right to occupy and use the property. The Director-General was obliged to conduct an enquiry under section 2 of the Act before any transfer of ownership could occur. The transfer to the first respondent was effected without such an enquiry and without consulting the applicants, rendering the transfer irregular and invalid. The sale and registration of the property in the first respondent's name must be cancelled, and an enquiry must be held to determine the rightful claimant.
- Citation
- [2012] ZAGPJHC 223
- Parties
- Applicant: Tuleleni Elizabeth Ndzimande; Applicant: Sibusiso Madlala; Respondent: Mlondolozi Ndzimande; Respondent: Director-General of Department of Housing, Gauteng Province; Respondent: The MEC for the Department of Housing, Gauteng Province; Respondent: The City of Johannesburg Municipality; Respondent: The Registrar of Deeds (Johannesburg)
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2012
- Case Number
- 24490/12
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; title deed cancelled; enquiry ordered; costs awarded against first respondent.
- Judges
- Kathree-Setiloane
- Legal Topics
- Conversion of Rights to Ownership, Section 2 Enquiry, Title Deed Cancellation, Irregular Transfer, Rights of Occupation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tuleleni Elizabeth Ndzimande
Applicant
Sibusiso Madlala
Applicant
Mlondolozi Ndzimande
Respondent
Director-General of Department of Housing, Gauteng Province
Respondent
The MEC for the Department of Housing, Gauteng Province
Respondent
The City of Johannesburg Municipality
Respondent
The Registrar of Deeds (Johannesburg)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of the property to the first respondent was valid in terms of the Conversion of Certain Rights into Leasehold or Ownership Act 81 of 1988.
- 2 Whether the applicants, as dependants listed on the certificate of occupation, were entitled to be consulted prior to the transfer.
- 3 Whether the Director-General was obliged to conduct an enquiry under section 2 of the Act before transfer.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, as dependants listed on the certificate of occupation, had a right to occupy and use the property. The Director-General was obliged to conduct an enquiry under section 2 of the Act before any transfer of ownership could occur. The transfer to the first respondent was effected without such an enquiry and without consulting the applicants, rendering the transfer irregular and invalid. The sale and registration of the property in the first respondent's name must be cancelled, and an enquiry must be held to determine the rightful claimant.
Court Disposition
Application granted; title deed cancelled; enquiry ordered; costs awarded against first respondent.
Orders
- The Registrar of Deeds (Johannesburg) is ordered to cancel title deed no 15305/2005 in respect of Erf 8514, Pimville, Zone 6 Township, Soweto and to cancel all rights accorded to the first respondent by virtue of the Title Deed.
- The Director-General for the Department of Housing, Gauteng Province, is directed to hold an enquiry in respect of Erf 8514, Pimville, Zone 6 Township, Soweto, in terms of section 2 of the Conversion of Certain Rights into Leasehold or Ownership Act 81 of 1988, for purposes of determining who the rightful claimant is.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment