Odendaal v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste (193/96) [1998] ZASCA 7; 1998 (3) SA 318 (SCA); [1998] 2 All SA 461 (A) (13 March 1998)

Odendaal v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste (193/96) [1998] ZASCA 7; 1998 (3) SA 318 (SCA); [1998] 2 All SA 461 (A) (13 March 1998)

The majority of the Supreme Court of Appeal held that the quantification of development expenditure in the IT 48 forms for the years in which the appellant incurred farming losses did not form part of the assessment as defined in the Income Tax Act. In those years, no deduction for development expenditure was allowed, and the figures carried forward were not determinations of taxable income, tax payable, or assessed loss. The finality provisions of the Act applied only to the results of the assessment, not to the particulars or calculations underlying those results. Therefore, the appellant was not entitled to object to the quantification of development expenditure in the loss years, and...

Citation
[1998] ZASCA 7
Parties
Appellant: H J Odendaal; Respondent: Commissioner for Inland Revenue
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 March 1998
Case Number
193/96
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Special Income Tax Court (johannesburg)
Judges
Van Heerden, Hefer, Marais, Schutz, Melunsky
Legal Topics
Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, Assessment Finality, Development Expenditure, Objection and Appeal Procedure, Carry Forward of Losses
Tax Law Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 Assessment Finality Development Expenditure Objection and Appeal Procedure Carry Forward of Losses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

H J Odendaal

Appellant

Commissioner for Inland Revenue

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Special Income Tax Court (johannesburg)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the determination of development expenditure carried forward in prescribed forms constitutes part of the 'assessment' under the Income Tax Act.
  2. 2 Whether errors in calculation of development expenditure in loss years are subject to objection and appeal procedures and finality provisions.
  3. 3 Whether the taxpayer is entitled to object to the quantification of development expenditure in years where no deduction is allowed.

Ratio Decidendi

The majority of the Supreme Court of Appeal held that the quantification of development expenditure in the IT 48 forms for the years in which the appellant incurred farming losses did not form part of the assessment as defined in the Income Tax Act. In those years, no deduction for development expenditure was allowed, and the figures carried forward were not determinations of taxable income, tax payable, or assessed loss. The finality provisions of the Act applied only to the results of the assessment, not to the particulars or calculations underlying those results. Therefore, the appellant was not entitled to object to the quantification of development expenditure in the loss years, and...