Old Mutual Properties (Pty) Ltd and Another v Avalon Group (Pty) Limited and Others (21/CAC/Jul02) [2003] ZACAC 3; [2003] 1 CPLR 46 (CAC) (24 April 2003)
The Court held that its jurisdiction to review is strictly limited by the Competition Act to decisions of the Competition Tribunal. The decisions challenged by the applicants were made by an Assigned Member and, except where specifically provided for in section 31(5), such decisions are not decisions of the Tribunal. The Act does not permit the Court to review procedural or interlocutory decisions of Assigned Members unless expressly provided. The applicants' reliance on the Anglo South Africa case was misplaced, as the review jurisdiction was not considered or decided in that matter. Accordingly, the point in limine was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2003] ZACAC 3
- Parties
- Applicant: Old Mutual Properties (Pty) Limited; Applicant: Old Mutual Life Assurance Company (South Africa) Limited; Respondent: Competition Tribunal; Respondent: Norman Manoim N.O.; Respondent: Avalon Group (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Videovision Entertainment (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Primedia Limited; Respondent: Ster-Kinekor Films (Pty) Limited
- Court
- Competition Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2003
- Case Number
- 21/CAC/JUL02
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Appeal From Pre Hearing Conference Decisions of Assigned Member
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; point in limine upheld.
- Judges
- Malan, Hussain, Jali
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Competition Appeal Court, Review of Tribunal Decisions, Powers of Assigned Member, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Old Mutual Properties (Pty) Limited
Applicant
Old Mutual Life Assurance Company (South Africa) Limited
Applicant
Competition Tribunal
Respondent
Norman Manoim N.O.
Respondent
Avalon Group (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Videovision Entertainment (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Primedia Limited
Respondent
Ster-Kinekor Films (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Appeal From Pre Hearing Conference Decisions of Assigned Member
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Competition Appeal Court has jurisdiction to review decisions of an Assigned Member of the Competition Tribunal.
- 2 Whether the decision to order discovery of the November 2001 lease agreement is reviewable and should be set aside.
- 3 Whether the refusal to refer a point of law for separate hearing is reviewable and should be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that its jurisdiction to review is strictly limited by the Competition Act to decisions of the Competition Tribunal. The decisions challenged by the applicants were made by an Assigned Member and, except where specifically provided for in section 31(5), such decisions are not decisions of the Tribunal. The Act does not permit the Court to review procedural or interlocutory decisions of Assigned Members unless expressly provided. The applicants' reliance on the Anglo South Africa case was misplaced, as the review jurisdiction was not considered or decided in that matter. Accordingly, the point in limine was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; point in limine upheld.
Orders
- The point in limine is upheld.
- The appeal is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment