Omar and Another v Minister of Agriculture & Land Affairs and Others (LCC102/07) [2007] ZALCC 20 (28 September 2007)

Omar and Another v Minister of Agriculture & Land Affairs and Others (LCC102/07) [2007] ZALCC 20 (28 September 2007)

The court granted the interim order by agreement between the parties, recognising the need to preserve the applicants' occupational rights and prevent any transfer, alienation, or interference with the property pending the outcome of the review application. The undertakings provided by the eighth, fourth, and fifth respondents were made binding on their successors, assigns, or liquidators. The Registrar of Deeds was interdicted from executing or attesting any deed of transfer or cession except as specifically authorised. The costs of the application were reserved for determination in the review proceedings. The order ensures that the status quo is maintained and that no prejudicial...

Citation
[2007] ZALCC 20
Parties
Applicant: F Omar; Applicant: S Kallier; Respondent: Minister of Agriculture & Land Affairs; Respondent: Commission on Restitution of Land Rights; Respondent: The City of Tshwane; Respondent: E S Ahmed; Respondent: R Ebrahim; Respondent: The Registrar of Deeds, Pretoria; Respondent: Master of the High Court (TPD); Respondent: Erma Street Properties cc; Respondent: Younis Davis
Court
Land Claims Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
28 September 2007
Case Number
LCC102/07
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Order Pending Review Application
Outcome
Interim order granted by agreement, preserving applicants' occupational rights and restraining respondents from dealing with the property pending review.
Legal Topics
Interdict, Transfer of Property, Occupational Rights, Review Application
Land and Property Civil Procedure Interdict Transfer of Property Occupational Rights Review Application

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

F Omar

Applicant

S Kallier

Applicant

Minister of Agriculture & Land Affairs

Respondent

Commission on Restitution of Land Rights

Respondent

The City of Tshwane

Respondent

E S Ahmed

Respondent

R Ebrahim

Respondent

The Registrar of Deeds, Pretoria

Respondent

Master of the High Court (TPD)

Respondent

Erma Street Properties cc

Respondent

Younis Davis

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Interim Order Pending Review Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicants and other lawful occupiers should be protected from eviction pending the outcome of the review application.
  2. 2 Whether the eighth respondent should be restrained from dealing with the property pending review.
  3. 3 Whether the Registrar of Deeds should be interdicted from registering any transfer or cession except as specified.

Ratio Decidendi

The court granted the interim order by agreement between the parties, recognising the need to preserve the applicants' occupational rights and prevent any transfer, alienation, or interference with the property pending the outcome of the review application. The undertakings provided by the eighth, fourth, and fifth respondents were made binding on their successors, assigns, or liquidators. The Registrar of Deeds was interdicted from executing or attesting any deed of transfer or cession except as specifically authorised. The costs of the application were reserved for determination in the review proceedings. The order ensures that the status quo is maintained and that no prejudicial...

Court Disposition

Interim order granted by agreement, preserving applicants' occupational rights and restraining respondents from dealing with the property pending review.

Orders

  • The eighth respondent shall not evict the applicants or any other lawful occupier of Erf 581, Asiatic Bazaar Extension 1, JR, Gauteng.
  • The eighth respondent shall not make any structural or other renovations, enter the property, or interfere with occupational rights without prior written permission of the applicants.