Ondombo Beleggings (Edms) Bpk. v Minister of Mineral and Energy Affairs (479/89) [1991] ZASCA 108; 1991 (4) SA 718 (AD); [1991] 2 All SA 508 (A) (19 September 1991)

Ondombo Beleggings (Edms) Bpk. v Minister of Mineral and Energy Affairs (479/89) [1991] ZASCA 108; 1991 (4) SA 718 (AD); [1991] 2 All SA 508 (A) (19 September 1991)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a prospecting lease under section 4 of the Precious Stones Act is a consensual contract requiring the inclusion of prescribed terms and conditions for validity. The appellant's particulars of claim did not allege the existence of valid leases, as the required terms and conditions were not determined. The purported grant by the Minister, without such terms, was a nullity and did not create any enforceable rights or duties. The court rejected the argument that the Minister was compelled to determine terms and conditions after a purported grant. The doctrine of legitimate expectation was not pleaded, but the appellant was granted leave to amend its...

Citation
[1991] ZASCA 108
Parties
Appellant: Ondombo Beleggings (Edms) Beperk; Respondent: Minister of Mineral and Energy Affairs
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 September 1991
Case Number
479/89
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order Upholding Exception and Striking Out Particulars of Claim
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; leave granted to appellant to amend particulars of claim within 21 days to plead legitimate expectation.
Judges
Eksteen, Botha, Vivier, Milne, Kriegler
Legal Topics
Prospecting Leases, Exception Procedure, Legitimate Expectation, Statutory Interpretation, Precious Stones Act, Contractual Nature of Leases
Land and Property Civil Procedure Administrative Law Prospecting Leases Exception Procedure Legitimate Expectation Statutory Interpretation Precious Stones Act +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ondombo Beleggings (Edms) Beperk

Appellant

Minister of Mineral and Energy Affairs

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order Upholding Exception and Striking Out Particulars of Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the particulars of claim disclosed a valid cause of action for the grant of prospecting leases under the Precious Stones Act.
  2. 2 Whether a prospecting lease under section 4 of the Act is a consensual contract requiring prescribed terms and conditions.
  3. 3 Whether the Minister is compelled to determine terms and conditions after purporting to grant a lease.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a prospecting lease under section 4 of the Precious Stones Act is a consensual contract requiring the inclusion of prescribed terms and conditions for validity. The appellant's particulars of claim did not allege the existence of valid leases, as the required terms and conditions were not determined. The purported grant by the Minister, without such terms, was a nullity and did not create any enforceable rights or duties. The court rejected the argument that the Minister was compelled to determine terms and conditions after a purported grant. The doctrine of legitimate expectation was not pleaded, but the appellant was granted leave to amend its...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; leave granted to appellant to amend particulars of claim within 21 days to plead legitimate expectation.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
  • The appellant is granted leave to amend its particulars of claim within 21 days of this judgment.