Opperman v Silver en Ander (4747/2011) [2012] ZAFSHC 233 (13 December 2012)

Opperman v Silver en Ander (4747/2011) [2012] ZAFSHC 233 (13 December 2012)

The court found that the applicant had provided sufficient evidence through his sworn affidavit and supporting written offers to indicate the value of the first respondent's assets. The court had previously determined that the minimum dividend to creditors would be at least 10 cents in the rand, with the possibility of it reaching 22 cents. However, after considering all facts and circumstances, the court concluded that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal regarding the benefit to creditors. Consequently, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Citation
[2012] ZAFSHC 233
Parties
Applicant: Christiaan Josia Opperman; Respondent: Martha Aletta Silver; Respondent: Kaapstad Herwinning
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 December 2012
Case Number
4747/2011
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sequestration Order
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
S.P.B. Hancke
Legal Topics
Sequestration Order, Leave to Appeal, Insolvent Estate, Burden of Proof
Civil Procedure Sequestration Order Leave to Appeal Insolvent Estate Burden of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christiaan Josia Opperman

Applicant

Martha Aletta Silver

Respondent

Kaapstad Herwinning

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sequestration Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown, on a balance of probabilities, that sequestration of the first respondent's estate will benefit creditors.
  2. 2 Whether there is a reasonable prospect of success on appeal regarding the benefit to creditors.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided sufficient evidence through his sworn affidavit and supporting written offers to indicate the value of the first respondent's assets. The court had previously determined that the minimum dividend to creditors would be at least 10 cents in the rand, with the possibility of it reaching 22 cents. However, after considering all facts and circumstances, the court concluded that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal regarding the benefit to creditors. Consequently, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
  • The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the application.