Osman Tyres and Spares CC and Another v ADT Security (Pty) Ltd (1174/2018) [2020] ZASCA 33; [2020] 3 All SA 73 (SCA) (3 April 2020)

Osman Tyres and Spares CC and Another v ADT Security (Pty) Ltd (1174/2018) [2020] ZASCA 33; [2020] 3 All SA 73 (SCA) (3 April 2020)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the exclusionary clause in the contract between Osman Tyres and Spares CC and ADT Security (Pty) Ltd did not exclude liability for gross negligence. The evidence adduced by the CC was sufficient to survive absolution from the instance, as there was a prima facie case of gross negligence based on repeated alarm activations and ADT's failure to respond. The separation of issues at trial was ambiguous, and causation should not have been considered at the absolution stage. The high court erred in granting absolution against the CC, but was correct in granting absolution against Mr Osman, who failed to provide evidence of emotional damages or expert...

Citation
[2020] ZASCA 33
Parties
Appellant: Osman Tyres and Spares CC; Appellant: Shiraz Mohammed Osman; Respondent: ADT Security (Pty) Ltd
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
3 April 2020
Case Number
1174/2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From North West High Court, Mahikeng; Application for Absolution From the Instance at Close of Plaintiffs' Case
Outcome
Appeal by Osman Tyres and Spares CC upheld; appeal by Mr Osman dismissed.
Judges
Ponnan, Saldulker, Mokgohloa, Nicholls, Koen
Legal Topics
Contractual Exclusion of Liability, Gross Negligence, Absolution From the Instance, Interpretation of Contracts, Private Security Regulation
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Contractual Exclusion of Liability Gross Negligence Absolution From the Instance Interpretation of Contracts Private Security Regulation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Osman Tyres and Spares CC

Appellant

Shiraz Mohammed Osman

Appellant

ADT Security (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From North West High Court, Mahikeng; Application for Absolution From the Instance at Close of Plaintiffs' Case

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the exclusionary clause in the contract excluded liability for gross negligence by the security service provider.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence adduced by the plaintiffs was sufficient to survive absolution from the instance.
  3. 3 Whether the separation of issues at trial was properly effected and whether causation formed part of the merits.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the exclusionary clause in the contract between Osman Tyres and Spares CC and ADT Security (Pty) Ltd did not exclude liability for gross negligence. The evidence adduced by the CC was sufficient to survive absolution from the instance, as there was a prima facie case of gross negligence based on repeated alarm activations and ADT's failure to respond. The separation of issues at trial was ambiguous, and causation should not have been considered at the absolution stage. The high court erred in granting absolution against the CC, but was correct in granting absolution against Mr Osman, who failed to provide evidence of emotional damages or expert...

Court Disposition

Appeal by Osman Tyres and Spares CC upheld; appeal by Mr Osman dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeal by the first appellant (Osman Tyres and Spares CC) is upheld.
  • The appeal by the second appellant (Mr Osman) is dismissed.