Outdoor Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Another v Minister of Police and Another (344/2022) [2023] ZASCA 72 (24 May 2023)

Outdoor Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Another v Minister of Police and Another (344/2022) [2023] ZASCA 72 (24 May 2023)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that neither the Firearms Control Act nor the Firearm Control Regulations permit one licensed firearms dealer to store firearms at its premises on behalf of another dealer. Regulation 67, when read in context and interpreted according to established principles, refers to storage...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] ZASCA 72
Parties
Appellant: Outdoor Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd t/a Safari Outdoor; Appellant: Inyathi Sporting Supplies (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Minister of Police; Respondent: National Commissioner for the South African Police Service
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
344/2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs, including those of two counsel.
Judges
Saldulker, Carelse, Nhlangulela, Kathree-Setiloane, Unterhalter
Legal Topics
Firearms Control Act, Statutory Interpretation, Dealer Licensing, Safe Storage Requirements
Administrative Law Land and Property Firearms Control Act Statutory Interpretation Dealer Licensing Safe Storage Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Outdoor Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd t/a Safari Outdoor

Appellant

Inyathi Sporting Supplies (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Minister of Police

Respondent

National Commissioner for the South African Police Service

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria

  1. 1 Whether regulation 67 of the Firearm Control Regulations permits one licensed firearms dealer to store firearms at its premises on behalf of another licensed dealer.
  2. 2 Whether the Firearms Control Act and its regulations allow a dealer to provide storage for firearms to another dealer.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that neither the Firearms Control Act nor the Firearm Control Regulations permit one licensed firearms dealer to store firearms at its premises on behalf of another dealer. Regulation 67, when read in context and interpreted according to established principles, refers to storage provided to individuals who may lawfully possess firearms, not to other dealers. Regulation 86(2) expressly requires dealers to store firearms only at the premises specified in their own licences, and this duty is peremptory. The statutory scheme consistently connects the storage and trade of firearms to the premises specified in the dealer’s licence, and the regulations do not...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs, including those of two counsel.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs including those of two counsel.