P A F v S C F (788/2020) [2022] ZASCA 101; 2022 (6) SA 162 (SCA) (22 June 2022)
The Supreme Court of Appeal refused the application for special leave to appeal. The court found no exceptional circumstances justifying the admission of further evidence on appeal, as the legal opinion sought to be introduced was not conclusive or decisive. The applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay in prosecuting the appeal, and the full court exercised its discretion judicially in refusing condonation. On the merits, the court held that where a spouse abuses the trust form to reduce the other spouse's accrual claim, the court is empowered under common law to pierce the trust veneer and include the value of the donation in the accrual calculation. The...
- Citation
- [2022] ZASCA 101
- Parties
- Applicant: P A F; Respondent: S C F
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2022
- Case Number
- 788/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal After Refusal by the Full Court of the Kwa Zulu Natal Division of the High Court.
- Outcome
- Application for special leave to appeal refused with costs, including costs of two counsel where so employed.
- Judges
- Dambuza, Molemela, Makgoka, Makaula, Weiner
- Legal Topics
- Accrual System, Trust Form Abuse, Piercing Trust Veneer, Condonation, Leave to Lead Further Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P A F
Applicant
S C F
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal After Refusal by the Full Court of the Kwa Zulu Natal Division of the High Court.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the value of assets donated to a trust by a spouse should be considered part of that spouse's estate for accrual calculation upon divorce.
- 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to adduce further evidence on appeal.
- 3 Whether condonation for late prosecution of the appeal should be granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal refused the application for special leave to appeal. The court found no exceptional circumstances justifying the admission of further evidence on appeal, as the legal opinion sought to be introduced was not conclusive or decisive. The applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay in prosecuting the appeal, and the full court exercised its discretion judicially in refusing condonation. On the merits, the court held that where a spouse abuses the trust form to reduce the other spouse's accrual claim, the court is empowered under common law to pierce the trust veneer and include the value of the donation in the accrual calculation. The...
Court Disposition
Application for special leave to appeal refused with costs, including costs of two counsel where so employed.
Orders
- The application for special leave to appeal is refused with costs, including costs of two counsel, where so employed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment