P G Bison Ltd and Others v Master of the High Court, Grahamstown and Another (515/97) [1999] ZASCA 92; [2000] 1 All SA 363 (A); 2000 (1) SA 859 (SCA) (29 November 1999)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the additional clause in the cession agreement did not suspend the transfer of rights to the appellants. The clause merely delayed the appellants' ability to exercise those rights until the account was overdue and notice was given. The wording of the cession and its provisions indicated an immediate and unconditional transfer of rights, with the corporation acting as agent for the appellants until the mandate was terminated. The court found that the parties intended to provide security to the appellants and that the cession in securitatem debiti was effective. The first respondent's direction to amend the liquidation and distribution account was...
- Citation
- [1999] ZASCA 92
- Parties
- Appellant: P G Bison Limited; Appellant: P G Bison (Alrode) (Proprietary) Limited; Appellant: P G Bison (Natal) (Proprietary) Limited; Respondent: The Master of the High Court, Grahamstown; Respondent: Andrew Stuart Paterson N O
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 1999
- Case Number
- 515/97
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Eastern Cape Division of the High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld with costs; order of the court a quo set aside and substituted with orders confirming the appellants' secured claims.
- Judges
- Grosskopf, Hefer, Olivier, Scott, Streicher
- Legal Topics
- Cession in Securitatem Debiti, Interpretation of Contracts, Liquidation and Distribution Accounts, Secured Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P G Bison Limited
Appellant
P G Bison (Alrode) (Proprietary) Limited
Appellant
P G Bison (Natal) (Proprietary) Limited
Appellant
The Master of the High Court, Grahamstown
Respondent
Andrew Stuart Paterson N O
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Eastern Cape Division of the High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of rights to the cessionaries under a cession in securitatem debiti was suspended by an additional clause.
- 2 What is the meaning and effect of the term 'to implement' in the context of the cession agreement.
- 3 Whether the appellants' claims against the corporation in liquidation were secured.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the additional clause in the cession agreement did not suspend the transfer of rights to the appellants. The clause merely delayed the appellants' ability to exercise those rights until the account was overdue and notice was given. The wording of the cession and its provisions indicated an immediate and unconditional transfer of rights, with the corporation acting as agent for the appellants until the mandate was terminated. The court found that the parties intended to provide security to the appellants and that the cession in securitatem debiti was effective. The first respondent's direction to amend the liquidation and distribution account was...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld with costs; order of the court a quo set aside and substituted with orders confirming the appellants' secured claims.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld with costs, such costs to be a cost of administration in the winding up of Pats Planks CC (in liquidation).
- The order of the court a quo is set aside and substituted with: (i) The first respondent’s direction to the second respondent to amend the first liquidation and distribution account of Pats Planks CC (in liquidation) to reflect the proceeds of the book debts in the free residue account is set aside; (ii) The...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment