Panatel CC t/a Panasonic Business Systems v Putter and Others (2528/2015) [2015] ZAFSHC 250 (14 August 2015)

Panatel CC t/a Panasonic Business Systems v Putter and Others (2528/2015) [2015] ZAFSHC 250 (14 August 2015)

The court granted the order as the respondents had consented to the delivery of the items listed in the sheriff's inventory to the applicant's attorney. The matter was unopposed, and the applicant's entitlement was not disputed. The court was satisfied that the order was justified under the circumstances.

Citation
[2015] ZAFSHC 250
Parties
Applicant: Panatel CC t/a Panasonic Business Systems; Respondent: Isabella Putter; Respondent: Bersalom (Pty) Ltd t/a Nashua; Respondent: Carospan (Pty) Ltd t/a Nashua Free State and Northern Cape
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 August 2015
Case Number
2528/2015
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Unopposed Motion
Outcome
Order granted in favour of the applicant; respondents to deliver the items listed in the sheriff's inventory to the applicant's attorney.
Judges
M. H. Rampai
Legal Topics
Delivery of Property, Consent Order
Civil Procedure Delivery of Property Consent Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Panatel CC t/a Panasonic Business Systems

Applicant

Isabella Putter

Respondent

Bersalom (Pty) Ltd t/a Nashua

Respondent

Carospan (Pty) Ltd t/a Nashua Free State and Northern Cape

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Unopposed Motion

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to delivery of the items listed in the sheriff's inventory.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents have consented to the order sought by the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court granted the order as the respondents had consented to the delivery of the items listed in the sheriff's inventory to the applicant's attorney. The matter was unopposed, and the applicant's entitlement was not disputed. The court was satisfied that the order was justified under the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Order granted in favour of the applicant; respondents to deliver the items listed in the sheriff's inventory to the applicant's attorney.

Orders

  • The respondents are ordered to hand over to the applicant's attorney the items as listed in the inventory by the sheriff.