Pandora A/S v Truworths Ltd (72261/13) [2015] ZAGPPHC 389; 2015 BIP 268 (GP) (3 June 2015)
The court found that the respondent had provided sufficient evidence of bona fide use of the ESSENCE trade mark in relation to goods in Class 14, specifically jewellery. The style cards and sales records demonstrated that garments sold by the respondent included detachable jewellery items bearing the ESSENCE mark, which could be worn separately. This constituted use of the trade mark in respect of goods covered by the registration. The court accepted that the definition of jewellery includes such items and that the respondent's use was commercially coherent and within the relevant period. Accordingly, the respondent discharged the onus to prove relevant use, and the application for...
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPPHC 389
- Parties
- Applicant: Pandora A/S; Respondent: Truworths Ltd
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 June 2015
- Case Number
- 72261/13
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application to Expunge Trade Mark Registration
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- D S Fourie
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Expungement, Bona Fide Use, Onus of Proof, Class 14 Goods, Trade Mark Act Section 27
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pandora A/S
Applicant
Truworths Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application to Expunge Trade Mark Registration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent has made bona fide use of the ESSENCE trade mark in relation to goods in Class 14.
- 2 Whether the trade mark registration should be expunged under section 27(1)(a) or (b) of the Trade Marks Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent had provided sufficient evidence of bona fide use of the ESSENCE trade mark in relation to goods in Class 14, specifically jewellery. The style cards and sales records demonstrated that garments sold by the respondent included detachable jewellery items bearing the ESSENCE mark, which could be worn separately. This constituted use of the trade mark in respect of goods covered by the registration. The court accepted that the definition of jewellery includes such items and that the respondent's use was commercially coherent and within the relevant period. Accordingly, the respondent discharged the onus to prove relevant use, and the application for...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application to expunge trade mark registration No 1990/3847 ESSENCE is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment