Pangbourne Properties Ltd and Another v Your Life (Pty) Ltd and Another (2010/17427) [2013] ZAGPJHC 230; [2013] 4 All SA 719 (GSJ) (3 September 2013)
The court found that at the time the first plaintiff instituted action, its right to payment was ceded to its banker and did not vest in it, and subsequently was ceded to the second plaintiff. The second plaintiff, at the time of joinder, had its rights ceded to its banker, but a retrospective re-cession from the bank vested the claims in the second plaintiff from a date prior to joinder. The court exercised its discretion to allow the second plaintiff to proceed with the claims against the second defendant, as no prejudice was suffered by the defendant and the debt always vested in someone. The first plaintiff currently has no rights to enforce, and the second plaintiff is entitled to...
- Citation
- [2013] ZAGPJHC 230
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Pangbourne Properties Ltd; Plaintiff: Fortress Income 3 (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Your Life (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: J.H. Woolf
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 September 2013
- Case Number
- 2010/17427
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Ruling on Locus Standi and Cession Issues; Action Against First Defendant Postponed; Action Proceeds Against Second Defendant
- Outcome
- Action against the first defendant postponed sine die; first and second plaintiffs' actions against the second defendant postponed sine die; costs awarded against the plaintiffs.
- Judges
- C Lamont
- Legal Topics
- Cession of Claims, Locus Standi, Lease Agreements, Arrear Rental, Damages for Holding Over
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pangbourne Properties Ltd
Plaintiff
Fortress Income 3 (Pty) Ltd
Plaintiff
Your Life (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
J.H. Woolf
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Ruling on Locus Standi and Cession Issues; Action Against First Defendant Postponed; Action Proceeds Against Second Defendant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs had a cause of action against the second defendant at the time of institution of action.
- 2 Whether the cession of claims to bankers deprived the plaintiffs of locus standi.
- 3 Whether retrospective re-cession entitled the second plaintiff to proceed with the claims.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that at the time the first plaintiff instituted action, its right to payment was ceded to its banker and did not vest in it, and subsequently was ceded to the second plaintiff. The second plaintiff, at the time of joinder, had its rights ceded to its banker, but a retrospective re-cession from the bank vested the claims in the second plaintiff from a date prior to joinder. The court exercised its discretion to allow the second plaintiff to proceed with the claims against the second defendant, as no prejudice was suffered by the defendant and the debt always vested in someone. The first plaintiff currently has no rights to enforce, and the second plaintiff is entitled to...
Court Disposition
Action against the first defendant postponed sine die; first and second plaintiffs' actions against the second defendant postponed sine die; costs awarded against the plaintiffs.
Orders
- The action against the first defendant is postponed sine die.
- The costs of that action are reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment