Pangbourne Properties Limited and Portion 118 of the farm Vogelfontein No.84 (99/LM/SEP07) [2007] ZACT 101 (11 December 2007)
- Citation
- [2007] ZACT 101
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- DH Lewis, N Manoim, U Bhoola
- Case number
- 99/LM/SEP07
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- DH Lewis, N Manoim, U Bhoola
- Case number
- 99/LM/SEP07
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the post-merger market share of Pangbourne in the Boksburg East node for light industrial properties would be 4.96%, which is insignificant and does not raise competition concerns. The transaction does not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market, and there are no significant public interest concerns. Therefore, the merger was unconditionally approved.
Court disposition
The merger is unconditionally approved.
Orders
- The proposed transaction between Pangbourne Properties Limited and Portion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No. 84 is unconditionally approved.
02
Material facts
Parties
Pangbourne Properties Limited
Applicant Counsel: Edward Nathan SonnenbergsPortion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No. 84
RespondentFriedshelf 221 (Pty) Ltd
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Pre Merger Market Share of Pangbourne: ZAR 2.9
- Pre Merger Market Share of T & B Boksburg: ZAR 2.06
- Post Merger Market Share: ZAR 4.96
03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Application / Decision on Approval
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed merger will substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant property market.
- 02
Whether there are any significant public interest concerns arising from the transaction.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Pangbourne argued that the acquisition of Portion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No. 84 would improve the distribution of its property portfolio and that the transaction would not result in any significant increase in market share or competition concerns in the Boksburg East node for light industrial properties.
- Respondent
- Friedshelf and the target property owners contended that the transaction would allow shareholders to realize the value of their investment and that the merger would not negatively affect competition or public interest in the relevant market.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Primegro Properties Ltd and Growthpoint Properties Ltd 29/LM/Jun03
The relevant geographic market in property mergers is defined by nodes, grouping geographic areas that compete with each other and are sufficiently close to be treated as relevant markets.
- 02
Competition Act, 89 of 1998
A merger is unlikely to raise competition concerns if the post-merger market share is insignificant and does not substantially prevent or lessen competition.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the post-merger market share of Pangbourne in the Boksburg East node for light industrial properties would be 4.96%, which is insignificant and does not raise competition concerns. The transaction does not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market, and there are no significant public interest concerns. Therefore, the merger was unconditionally approved.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that the classification of properties within nodes is essential for accurate market definition in property mergers.
- It was observed that only Anderbolt 04 among Pangbourne's properties in the area is classified as heavy industrial, with the rest being light industrial.
Court disposition
The merger is unconditionally approved.
- The proposed transaction between Pangbourne Properties Limited and Portion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No. 84 is unconditionally approved.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No.: 99/LM/SEP07
In the matter between:
Pangbourne Properties Limited Primary Acquiring Firm
and
Portion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No. 84 Primary Target Firm
______________
Panel : DH Lewis (Presiding Member), N Manoim (Tribunal
Member), and U Bhoola (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 7 November 2007
Decided on : 11 December 2007
REASONS FOR DECISION
Approval
[1] On 7 November 2007 the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved the property merger between Pangbourne Properties Limited and Portion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No.
84.
The Parties
[2] The primary acquiring firm is Pangbourne Properties Limited (âPangbourneâ) and the primary target property is Portion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No. 84 (âT & B Boksburgâ) which is owned by Friedshelf 221 (Pty) Ltd (âFriedshelfâ).
[3] Pangbourneâs overall portfolio consists of industrial, retail and office properties throughout South Africa, and the target property T & B Boksburg is a light industrial property situated in the Boksburg East node.
The Transaction
[4] In terms of the proposed transaction, Pangbourne intends to acquire from Friedshelf, Portion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No.
84. The rationale for Pangbourne is to improve the distribution of its property portfolio, and for the shareholders of Friedshelf, the transaction will allow them to realize the value of their investment.
The Relevant Geographic Market
[5] The Tribunalâs approach in defining the relevant geographic market in property mergers has been on the basis of nodes in which different geographic areas that compete with each other are grouped, which vary for the different types of properties, and should sufficiently be close to justify the conclusion that they should be treated as relevant geographic markets.1
[6] An overlap in this merger exists in relation to light industrial properties in the Boksburg East node. Pangbourne already owns various light industrial properties within a 5 kilometer radius of the Boksburg East node which includes; PVC, Anderbolt 03, Anderbolt 04, Anderbolt 07 and Anderbolt 09.2 T & B Boksburg as mentioned above, is a light industrial property situated in the Boksburg East node.
Competition Evaluation
[7] According to the market share estimates provided by the merging parties; pre-merger Pangbourne has 2.90%, and T & B Boksburg has 2.06% market share. The market share accretion is 2.06%, resulting in a post merger market share of 4.96% of light industrial property in the Boksburg East node. This is clearly insignificant to raise any competition concerns.
Conclusion
[8] We are satisfied that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the property market generally, including light industrial property situated in the Boksburg East node. There are no significant public interest concerns. Accordingly, the proposed transaction is unconditionally approved.
___ 11 December 2007
D Lewis Date
Presiding Member
N Manoim and U Bhoola concur in the judgment of D Lewis
Tribunal Researcher: L Xaba
For the Merging Parties : Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs
For the Commission : M Mashaba
(Mergers and Acquisitions)
1 Primegro Properties Ltd and Growthpoint Properties Ltd 29/LM/Jun03
2 All of these properties fall under light industrial classification except Anderbolt 04 which is a heavy industrial property
3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.