Pasha and Others v Minister of Police (A177/2015) [2015] ZAGPPHC 627 (2 September 2015)
The appeal was dismissed because the trial court's findings on both fact and law were supported by the record and not shown to be clearly wrong. The police officers had reasonable grounds to suspect the appellants of committing public violence, a Schedule 1 offence, and acted within the powers granted by section 40(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The trial court correctly found the respondent's witnesses credible and identified material contradictions in the appellants' evidence. The appellants failed to prove unlawful arrest, detention, or assault, and the respondent discharged the onus of justifying the arrests. There was no basis for appellate interference with the trial court's...
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPPHC 627
- Parties
- Appellant: Ndivhuwo Catherine Pasha; Appellant: Zondeka Roseleta Mathebula; Appellant: Meleni Calvin Nedombeloni; Appellant: Samuel Mukosi; Appellant: Pfulani Joel Mashava; Appellant: Nyelisani Albert Ramkuela; Appellant: Magezi Joseph Kubayi; Appellant: Avhapfani Joseph Kubayi; Appellant: Elias Valoyi; Appellant: Robert H Chauke; Appellant: Resimati Samuel Hlongwane; Appellant: Abel Maluleke; Appellant: Mmboneni Ramakavhi; Appellant: Tshilidzi Godfrey Mudau; Appellant: Moloko Elvis Tlou; Appellant: Moropeng Sathekge; Respondent: Minister of Police
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 September 2015
- Case Number
- A177/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Court Judgment on Liability for Damages
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Strijdom, S.A.M Baqwa
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Arrest, Public Violence, Reasonable Suspicion, Assault by Police, Damages for Detention, Credibility of Witnesses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ndivhuwo Catherine Pasha
Appellant
Zondeka Roseleta Mathebula
Appellant
Meleni Calvin Nedombeloni
Appellant
Samuel Mukosi
Appellant
Pfulani Joel Mashava
Appellant
Nyelisani Albert Ramkuela
Appellant
Magezi Joseph Kubayi
Appellant
Avhapfani Joseph Kubayi
Appellant
Elias Valoyi
Appellant
Robert H Chauke
Appellant
Resimati Samuel Hlongwane
Appellant
Abel Maluleke
Appellant
Mmboneni Ramakavhi
Appellant
Tshilidzi Godfrey Mudau
Appellant
Moloko Elvis Tlou
Appellant
Moropeng Sathekge
Appellant
Minister of Police
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Court Judgment on Liability for Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arresting officers had reasonable grounds to suspect the appellants of committing a Schedule 1 offence.
- 2 Whether the arrest and detention of the appellants were unlawful.
- 3 Whether the appellants were assaulted by police officers during the arrest.
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the trial court's findings on both fact and law were supported by the record and not shown to be clearly wrong. The police officers had reasonable grounds to suspect the appellants of committing public violence, a Schedule 1 offence, and acted within the powers granted by section 40(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The trial court correctly found the respondent's witnesses credible and identified material contradictions in the appellants' evidence. The appellants failed to prove unlawful arrest, detention, or assault, and the respondent discharged the onus of justifying the arrests. There was no basis for appellate interference with the trial court's...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment