Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa v Maluleka (41002/2011) [2014] ZAGPPHC 346 (11 June 2014)

Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa v Maluleka (41002/2011) [2014] ZAGPPHC 346 (11 June 2014)

The court found that the applicant demonstrated reasonable prospects of success on appeal and that the issues raised are of sufficient importance to justify consideration by the Full Bench. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted and the costs were ordered to be costs in the appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] ZAGPPHC 346
Parties
Applicant: Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa; Respondent: Tobias Katlego Maluleka
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
41002/2011
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Full Bench
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted to the Full Bench; costs to be costs in the appeal.
Judges
C Pretorius
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Costs in the Appeal
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Costs in the Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa

Applicant

Tobias Katlego Maluleka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Full Bench

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted to the Full Bench of the High Court.
  2. 2 Who should bear the costs of the application for leave to appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant demonstrated reasonable prospects of success on appeal and that the issues raised are of sufficient importance to justify consideration by the Full Bench. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted and the costs were ordered to be costs in the appeal.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted to the Full Bench; costs to be costs in the appeal.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is granted to the Full Bench of the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division.
  • Costs to be costs in the appeal.