P.D.D (Born M) v P.A.D (414744/16) [2022] ZAGPPHC 757 (13 October 2022)

P.D.D (Born M) v P.A.D (414744/16) [2022] ZAGPPHC 757 (13 October 2022)

The court found that the marriage between the parties had irretrievably broken down, as evidenced by their separation for over five years, lack of conjugal relations, and failed attempts at reconciliation. The applicant was a credible witness, while the respondent failed to provide convincing evidence to the contrary. The best interests of the minor children required that primary care and residence be awarded to the applicant, with reasonable contact rights for the respondent. The division of the joint estate was ordered in accordance with the law, and maintenance for the children was referred to the Maintenance Court, with an interim maintenance order granted. The respondent was ordered...

Citation
[2022] ZAGPPHC 757
Parties
Applicant: P.D.D (Born M); Respondent: P.A.D
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 October 2022
Case Number
414744/16
Procedural Posture
Divorce Action / Final Judgment
Outcome
Final order of divorce granted; joint estate to be divided; primary care and residence of minor children awarded to applicant; interim maintenance ordered; costs awarded against respondent.
Judges
A P Ledwaba
Legal Topics
Divorce, Division of Joint Estate, Primary Care of Children, Maintenance, Costs Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P.D.D (Born M)

Applicant

P.A.D

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Action / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the marriage between the parties has irretrievably broken down.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of divorce and division of the joint estate.
  3. 3 Determination of primary care and residence of the minor children.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the marriage between the parties had irretrievably broken down, as evidenced by their separation for over five years, lack of conjugal relations, and failed attempts at reconciliation. The applicant was a credible witness, while the respondent failed to provide convincing evidence to the contrary. The best interests of the minor children required that primary care and residence be awarded to the applicant, with reasonable contact rights for the respondent. The division of the joint estate was ordered in accordance with the law, and maintenance for the children was referred to the Maintenance Court, with an interim maintenance order granted. The respondent was ordered...

Court Disposition

Final order of divorce granted; joint estate to be divided; primary care and residence of minor children awarded to applicant; interim maintenance ordered; costs awarded against respondent.

Orders

  • A final order of divorce is granted.
  • The joint estate is to be equally divided.