P.D.D (Born M) v P.A.D (414744/16) [2022] ZAGPPHC 757 (13 October 2022)
The court found that the marriage between the parties had irretrievably broken down, as evidenced by their separation for over five years, lack of conjugal relations, and failed attempts at reconciliation. The applicant was a credible witness, while the respondent failed to provide convincing evidence to the contrary. The best interests of the minor children required that primary care and residence be awarded to the applicant, with reasonable contact rights for the respondent. The division of the joint estate was ordered in accordance with the law, and maintenance for the children was referred to the Maintenance Court, with an interim maintenance order granted. The respondent was ordered...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAGPPHC 757
- Parties
- Applicant: P.D.D (Born M); Respondent: P.A.D
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2022
- Case Number
- 414744/16
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Action / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Final order of divorce granted; joint estate to be divided; primary care and residence of minor children awarded to applicant; interim maintenance ordered; costs awarded against respondent.
- Judges
- A P Ledwaba
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Division of Joint Estate, Primary Care of Children, Maintenance, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P.D.D (Born M)
Applicant
P.A.D
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Action / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the parties has irretrievably broken down.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of divorce and division of the joint estate.
- 3 Determination of primary care and residence of the minor children.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the marriage between the parties had irretrievably broken down, as evidenced by their separation for over five years, lack of conjugal relations, and failed attempts at reconciliation. The applicant was a credible witness, while the respondent failed to provide convincing evidence to the contrary. The best interests of the minor children required that primary care and residence be awarded to the applicant, with reasonable contact rights for the respondent. The division of the joint estate was ordered in accordance with the law, and maintenance for the children was referred to the Maintenance Court, with an interim maintenance order granted. The respondent was ordered...
Court Disposition
Final order of divorce granted; joint estate to be divided; primary care and residence of minor children awarded to applicant; interim maintenance ordered; costs awarded against respondent.
Orders
- A final order of divorce is granted.
- The joint estate is to be equally divided.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment