Peter v Member of the Executive Council Department of Education Eastern Cape Province and Others (P 276/12) [2015] ZALCPE 16 (5 March 2015)

Peter v Member of the Executive Council Department of Education Eastern Cape Province and Others (P 276/12) [2015] ZALCPE 16 (5 March 2015)

The court held that the applicant had not complied with the mandatory requirements of the Department's transfer policy, specifically by failing to submit a completed application form as required by circular 19 of 2007. The incomplete form did not provide the necessary information for the Department to properly...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] ZALCPE 16
Parties
Applicant: Nomandlovu Edna Peter; Respondent: Member of the Executive Council Department of Education Eastern Cape Province; Respondent: Head of Department Eastern Cape Province; Respondent: Minister of Basic Education; Respondent: Director-General Department of Basic Education
Court
Labour Court Port Elizabeth
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
P 276/12
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed.
Judges
Lallie
Legal Topics
Employment of Educators Act, Transfer Policy, Procedural Compliance, Administrative Action
Labour Law Employment of Educators Act Transfer Policy Procedural Compliance Administrative Action

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nomandlovu Edna Peter

Applicant

Member of the Executive Council Department of Education Eastern Cape Province

Respondent

Head of Department Eastern Cape Province

Respondent

Minister of Basic Education

Respondent

Director-General Department of Basic Education

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to compel the Department to consider her transfer application despite submitting an incomplete application form.
  2. 2 Whether compliance with the Department's transfer policy is a prerequisite for consideration of a transfer application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the applicant had not complied with the mandatory requirements of the Department's transfer policy, specifically by failing to submit a completed application form as required by circular 19 of 2007. The incomplete form did not provide the necessary information for the Department to properly consider the transfer request. The court found that the Department is entitled to enforce its transfer policy and cannot be compelled to consider an application that does not meet its procedural requirements. Therefore, the application was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed.

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.