Phethogo Consulting (Pty) Ltd and Others v MEC: Free State Provincial Government: Department of Public Works and Infrastructure (5009/2021) [2022] ZAFSHC 346 (7 December 2022)
The court found that the interim payment certificate issued in terms of the construction contract is a liquid document, amounting to an acknowledgment of debt by the respondent. The respondent failed to advance any valid defence to payment, as the contract expressly provided for the CPAP base month and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] ZAFSHC 346
- Parties
- Applicant: Phethogo Consulting (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Dikopo Construction (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Razzmatazz Civil (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: SVP Quantity Surveyors and Projects Managers (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Construction Safety Services CC; Respondent: MEC: Free State Provincial Government: Department of Public Works and Infrastructure
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 December 2022
- Case Number
- 5009/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Opposed Motion for Payment Based on Interim Payment Certificate
- Outcome
- Application granted in favour of the applicants.
- Judges
- Van Rhyn
- Legal Topics
- Construction Contracts, Interim Payment Certificate, Liquid Document, Specific Performance, Contractual Liability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Phethogo Consulting (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Dikopo Construction (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Razzmatazz Civil (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
SVP Quantity Surveyors and Projects Managers (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Construction Safety Services CC
Applicant
MEC: Free State Provincial Government: Department of Public Works and Infrastructure
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Opposed Motion for Payment Based on Interim Payment Certificate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent is obliged to pay the amount certified in the interim payment certificate.
- 2 Whether the respondent's budgetary constraints or pending final invoice constitute a valid defence to payment.
- 3 Whether the application is premature due to ongoing settlement discussions.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the interim payment certificate issued in terms of the construction contract is a liquid document, amounting to an acknowledgment of debt by the respondent. The respondent failed to advance any valid defence to payment, as the contract expressly provided for the CPAP base month and the obligation to pay certified amounts within 21 days. The respondent's arguments regarding budgetary constraints, pending final invoice, and alleged prematurity of the application were rejected as inconsistent with the contract terms and irrelevant to the applicants' right to payment. The court held that the respondent is contractually bound to pay the amount certified in the interim...
Court Disposition
Application granted in favour of the applicants.
Orders
- The respondent shall pay to the applicants the amount of R 7,442,219.82.
- The respondent shall pay default interest on the amount of R 7,442,219.82 at the rate of 7% per annum calculated from 14 October 2020 until date of final payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment