Phineas & 74 Others v City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality (J 1162/20) [2022] ZALCJHB 70 (23 March 2022)

Phineas & 74 Others v City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality (J 1162/20) [2022] ZALCJHB 70 (23 March 2022)

The court found that, after considering the grounds for leave to appeal, the application does not disclose reasonable prospects of success. The judge determined that the applicants failed to demonstrate that another court would likely reach a different conclusion on the merits of the case. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was refused.

Citation
[2022] ZALCJHB 70
Parties
Applicant: Ralegogo, Phineas & 74 Others; Respondent: City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 March 2022
Case Number
J 1162/20
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment Delivered on 1 February 2022.
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal refused with no order as to costs.
Judges
G. N. Moshoana
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Prospects of Success
Labour Law Leave to Appeal Prospects of Success

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ralegogo, Phineas & 74 Others

Applicant

City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment Delivered on 1 February 2022.

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal has reasonable prospects of success.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, after considering the grounds for leave to appeal, the application does not disclose reasonable prospects of success. The judge determined that the applicants failed to demonstrate that another court would likely reach a different conclusion on the merits of the case. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused with no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is refused.
  • There is no order as to costs.