Phoka v D C and Others (1591/2020) [2020] ZAFSHC 237 (10 December 2020)
The court found that the applicant is presumed to be the child of the deceased by virtue of being born of the marriage, and this presumption stands unless rebutted by substantive evidence, not mere discrepancies in names or dates of birth. The First Respondent failed to provide documentary proof of the alleged 2012 paternity test and refused to cooperate with further testing, thereby acting contrary to her obligations as guardian. The court held that the interests of the minor child and the proper administration of the deceased's estate require a definitive determination of paternity. Accordingly, the First Respondent is compelled to subject the minor child to a paternity test within 30...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAFSHC 237
- Parties
- Applicant: Rethabile Elizabeth Phoka; Respondent: D C; Respondent: Master of High Court South Africa, Bloemfontein; Respondent: Legal Aid South Africa
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2020
- Case Number
- 1591/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Compel / Part A: Application to Compel; Part B: Declaratory Order Pending Outcome of Part a
- Outcome
- Application to compel granted; First Respondent ordered to subject minor child to paternity test within 30 days; costs reserved pending Part B.
- Judges
- T.V Raikane
- Legal Topics
- Paternity Dispute, Maintenance Order, Letter of Authority, Pension Fund Benefits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rethabile Elizabeth Phoka
Applicant
D C
Respondent
Master of High Court South Africa, Bloemfontein
Respondent
Legal Aid South Africa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Compel / Part A: Application to Compel; Part B: Declaratory Order Pending Outcome of Part a
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the minor child, S C, is the biological child of the deceased for purposes of pension fund benefits.
- 2 Whether the First Respondent is obliged to subject the minor child to a paternity test.
- 3 Whether the Applicant is entitled to a letter of authority as the nominated beneficiary.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant is presumed to be the child of the deceased by virtue of being born of the marriage, and this presumption stands unless rebutted by substantive evidence, not mere discrepancies in names or dates of birth. The First Respondent failed to provide documentary proof of the alleged 2012 paternity test and refused to cooperate with further testing, thereby acting contrary to her obligations as guardian. The court held that the interests of the minor child and the proper administration of the deceased's estate require a definitive determination of paternity. Accordingly, the First Respondent is compelled to subject the minor child to a paternity test within 30...
Court Disposition
Application to compel granted; First Respondent ordered to subject minor child to paternity test within 30 days; costs reserved pending Part B.
Orders
- The First Respondent is directed to subject the minor child to a paternity test for the purpose of determining whether the deceased is the biological father of the minor child within 30 days of this order.
- Costs reserved until the determination of Part B of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment