Pick n Pay Retailers Proprietary Limited v Lakeside City Trading 226 Proprietary Limited t/a Pick n Pay Family Store Protea North (2025-056881) [2025] ZAGPPHC 505 (16 May 2025)
The applicant demonstrated a clear contractual right to perfect the general notarial covering bond based on the respondent's admitted default and substantial indebtedness. The respondent's opposition, including reliance on an alleged informal agreement, a pending PAIA application, and a damages claim, was found to be without merit and insufficient to defeat the applicant's rights. The urgency of the application was justified by the respondent's precarious financial position and ongoing commercial loss, and the court's discretion to refuse perfection was limited by established legal principles. The court granted the order authorizing the applicant to take possession of the respondent's...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPPHC 505
- Parties
- Applicant: Pick n Pay Retailers Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Lakeside City Trading 226 Proprietary Limited t/a Pick n Pay Family Store Protea North
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2025
- Case Number
- 2025-056881
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; counterapplication struck.
- Judges
- Roux AJ
- Legal Topics
- Notarial Covering Bond, Franchise Agreement Enforcement, Urgent Interdict, Specific Performance, Contractual Variation, Promotion of Access to Information Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pick n Pay Retailers Proprietary Limited
Applicant
Lakeside City Trading 226 Proprietary Limited t/a Pick n Pay Family Store Protea North
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to urgent perfection of a general notarial covering bond over the respondent's movable assets.
- 2 Whether the respondent's opposition based on an alleged informal agreement, pending PAIA application, and damages claim can defeat the applicant's contractual rights.
- 3 Whether the urgency of the application is justified by the respondent's financial position and ongoing commercial loss.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant demonstrated a clear contractual right to perfect the general notarial covering bond based on the respondent's admitted default and substantial indebtedness. The respondent's opposition, including reliance on an alleged informal agreement, a pending PAIA application, and a damages claim, was found to be without merit and insufficient to defeat the applicant's rights. The urgency of the application was justified by the respondent's precarious financial position and ongoing commercial loss, and the court's discretion to refuse perfection was limited by established legal principles. The court granted the order authorizing the applicant to take possession of the respondent's...
Court Disposition
Application granted; counterapplication struck.
Orders
- The applicant is authorized and empowered, through its duly authorized representative and/or the Sheriff, to take possession of the respondent's movable assets for the purpose of perfecting the general notarial covering bond registered in favour of the applicant.
- The applicant is authorized to exercise the rights contemplated in clauses 6.1.1 to 6.1.10 of the bond, including claiming and recovering all sums secured by the bond, entering the respondent's premises, conducting the respondent's business, selling assets, and taking all necessary steps to perfect security.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment