Pieterse NO v Lephalale Local Municipality (CCT184/16) [2016] ZACC 40; 2017 (2) BCLR 233 (CC) (10 November 2016)
Section 139 of the Town-planning and Townships Ordinance 15 of 1986 is inconsistent with the Constitution because it authorises provincial government to exercise appellate powers over municipal planning decisions, thereby intruding into the exclusive domain of municipalities. The Constitution reserves municipal planning powers to local government, and any mechanism that subjects municipal planning decisions to provincial appeal constitutes impermissible interference. The High Court's declaration of invalidity is confirmed. The order is not retrospective and does not affect finalised appeals; pending appeals under section 139 may continue until finalisation, but the provincial board must...
- Citation
- [2016] ZACC 40
- Parties
- Applicant: Hendrik Diederick Pieterse N.O.; Applicant: Elizabeth Barindina Pieterse N.O.; Respondent: Lephalale Local Municipality; Respondent: Member of the Executive Council for Local Government and Housing, Limpopo; Respondent: Limpopo Townships Board; Respondent: At Sold Properties CC
- Court
- Constitutional Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2016
- Case Number
- CCT184/16
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Confirmation / Confirmation of High Court Order of Constitutional Invalidity
- Outcome
- The Constitutional Court confirms the High Court's declaration that section 139 of the Town-planning and Townships Ordinance 15 of 1986 is constitutionally invalid. The order operates prospectively and does not affect finalised appeals; pending appeals may continue until finalisation.
- Judges
- Mogoeng, Nkabinde, Cameron, Froneman, Jafta, Khampepe, Madlanga, Mbha, Mhlantla, Musi, Zondo
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Planning, Separation of Powers, Provincial Interference, Constitutional Invalidity, Confirmation Proceedings, Retrospective Effect
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hendrik Diederick Pieterse N.O.
Applicant
Elizabeth Barindina Pieterse N.O.
Applicant
Lephalale Local Municipality
Respondent
Member of the Executive Council for Local Government and Housing, Limpopo
Respondent
Limpopo Townships Board
Respondent
At Sold Properties CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Confirmation / Confirmation of High Court Order of Constitutional Invalidity
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 139 of the Town-planning and Townships Ordinance 15 of 1986 is constitutionally invalid due to provincial interference in municipal planning decisions.
- 2 Whether the declaration of invalidity should operate retrospectively or prospectively.
- 3 Whether pending appeals under section 139 should continue until finalisation.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 139 of the Town-planning and Townships Ordinance 15 of 1986 is inconsistent with the Constitution because it authorises provincial government to exercise appellate powers over municipal planning decisions, thereby intruding into the exclusive domain of municipalities. The Constitution reserves municipal planning powers to local government, and any mechanism that subjects municipal planning decisions to provincial appeal constitutes impermissible interference. The High Court's declaration of invalidity is confirmed. The order is not retrospective and does not affect finalised appeals; pending appeals under section 139 may continue until finalisation, but the provincial board must...
Court Disposition
The Constitutional Court confirms the High Court's declaration that section 139 of the Town-planning and Townships Ordinance 15 of 1986 is constitutionally invalid. The order operates prospectively and does not affect finalised appeals; pending appeals may continue until finalisation.
Orders
- The order of the High Court declaring section 139 of the Town-planning and Townships Ordinance 15 of 1986 constitutionally invalid is confirmed.
- The declaration of invalidity is not retrospective and does not affect finalised appeals.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment