Pilanesburg Platinum Mines (Pty) Ltd v Ramabulana; In re: Ramabulana v Pilanesburg Platinum Mines (Pty) Ltd (J808/13) [2016] ZALCJHB 285 (27 July 2016)

Pilanesburg Platinum Mines (Pty) Ltd v Ramabulana; In re: Ramabulana v Pilanesburg Platinum Mines (Pty) Ltd (J808/13) [2016] ZALCJHB 285 (27 July 2016)

The court found that the applicant demonstrated reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The delay in filing the application for leave to appeal was condoned as the applicant provided sufficient explanation and the interests of justice favoured granting condonation. Accordingly, both the application for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] ZALCJHB 285
Parties
Applicant: Pilanesburg Platinum Mines (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Lisebo Lerato Pearl Ramabulana
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
J808/13
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment Delivered on 12 June 2015.
Outcome
Application for condonation and leave to appeal granted. No order as to costs.
Judges
Whitcher
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Condonation of Late Filing
Labour Law Leave to Appeal Condonation of Late Filing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pilanesburg Platinum Mines (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Lisebo Lerato Pearl Ramabulana

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment Delivered on 12 June 2015.

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the judgment delivered on 12 June 2015.
  2. 2 Whether condonation for the late filing of the application for leave to appeal should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant demonstrated reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The delay in filing the application for leave to appeal was condoned as the applicant provided sufficient explanation and the interests of justice favoured granting condonation. Accordingly, both the application for condonation and the application for leave to appeal were granted. No order as to costs was made.

Court Disposition

Application for condonation and leave to appeal granted. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • The application for condonation of late filing of leave to appeal is granted.
  • The application for leave to appeal is granted.