Porrit and Another v National Prosecuting Authority of South Africa and Others [2023] ZAGPPHC 136; B825/2023 (6 March 2023)
The application for a mandamus compelling the NDPP to issue a certificate nolle prosequi fails because the NDPP cannot comply with the statutory requirement to consider the statements or affidavits on which the charge is based, as the docket is unavailable. The applicants' delay in requesting the certificate contributed to the impossibility of reconstructing the docket before the prescription period lapses. The principle lex non cogit ad impossibilia applies: the law does not require the impossible. Therefore, the NDPP is not legally able to issue the certificate, and the application must be dismissed. Each party is to bear its own costs.
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPPHC 136
- Parties
- Applicant: Gary Patrick Porritt; Applicant: Susan Hilary Bennett; Respondent: National Prosecuting Authority of South Africa; Respondent: National Director of Public Prosecutions; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions, Pretoria
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 March 2023
- Case Number
- B825/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Mandamus to Compel Issue of Nolle Prosequi Certificate
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Millar
- Legal Topics
- Nolle Prosequi Certificate, Private Prosecution, Mandamus, Lex Non Cogit Ad Impossibilia, Administrative Action, Prescription of Criminal Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gary Patrick Porritt
Applicant
Susan Hilary Bennett
Applicant
National Prosecuting Authority of South Africa
Respondent
National Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Director of Public Prosecutions, Pretoria
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Mandamus to Compel Issue of Nolle Prosequi Certificate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the National Director of Public Prosecutions can be compelled to issue a certificate nolle prosequi under section 7(2)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act when the docket is unavailable.
- 2 Whether the applicants' delay in requesting the certificate affects their entitlement to relief.
- 3 Whether the NDPP is legally able to issue the certificate in the absence of the docket and supporting affidavits.
Ratio Decidendi
The application for a mandamus compelling the NDPP to issue a certificate nolle prosequi fails because the NDPP cannot comply with the statutory requirement to consider the statements or affidavits on which the charge is based, as the docket is unavailable. The applicants' delay in requesting the certificate contributed to the impossibility of reconstructing the docket before the prescription period lapses. The principle lex non cogit ad impossibilia applies: the law does not require the impossible. Therefore, the NDPP is not legally able to issue the certificate, and the application must be dismissed. Each party is to bear its own costs.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment