Potch Speed Den v Rajah (J647/99) [1999] ZALC 27 (3 March 1999)
The court held that once an arbitration award has been made an order of court under section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act, it acquires the status of a court order and is no longer subject to review as an award. Any party wishing to challenge such an order must first seek rescission or setting aside of the court order, not review of the underlying award. Section 145(3) does not apply to awards that have already been made orders of court. As the applicant did not seek rescission or setting aside of the court order, its application to stay enforcement pending review was not competent and had to be dismissed.
- Citation
- [1999] ZALC 27
- Parties
- Applicant: Potch Speed Den; Respondent: Mr. E. Rajah
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 March 1999
- Case Number
- J647/99
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Application to Stay Enforcement of Arbitration Award Pending Review
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Judges
- R M M Zondo
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Award Enforcement, Review Proceedings, Stay of Execution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Potch Speed Den
Applicant
Mr. E. Rajah
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application to Stay Enforcement of Arbitration Award Pending Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Is it competent to review an arbitration award after it has been made an order of court?
- 2 Can the enforcement of such an award be stayed pending review?
- 3 Does section 145(3) of the Labour Relations Act apply to awards made orders of court?
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that once an arbitration award has been made an order of court under section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act, it acquires the status of a court order and is no longer subject to review as an award. Any party wishing to challenge such an order must first seek rescission or setting aside of the court order, not review of the underlying award. Section 145(3) does not apply to awards that have already been made orders of court. As the applicant did not seek rescission or setting aside of the court order, its application to stay enforcement pending review was not competent and had to be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- The application to stay the enforcement of the award is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment