Potgieter v British Airways Plc (7154/03) [2005] ZAWCHC 5; 2005 (3) SA 133 (C) (25 January 2005)

Potgieter v British Airways Plc (7154/03) [2005] ZAWCHC 5; 2005 (3) SA 133 (C) (25 January 2005)

The court held that the Warsaw Convention, as incorporated into South African law, provides the exclusive cause of action and sole remedy for passengers seeking damages arising out of international carriage by air. The Convention limits liability to cases of death, wounding, or bodily injury sustained on board the aircraft or during embarkation or disembarkation. Claims for humiliation, impairment of dignity, or psychological harm, absent bodily injury, are not sustainable under South African law in this context. The court found that the interpretation adopted by the UK House of Lords and the US Supreme Court is congruent with the language and purpose of the Convention and should be...

Citation
[2005] ZAWCHC 5
Parties
Plaintiff: Neil Vincent Potgieter; Defendant: British Airways Plc
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
25 January 2005
Case Number
7154/03
Procedural Posture
Exception Application / Exception to Particulars of Claim
Outcome
Exception upheld. Plaintiff granted leave to amend particulars of claim. Plaintiff ordered to pay costs of the exception, including costs of two counsel.
Judges
Davis
Legal Topics
International Carriage by Air, Warsaw Convention Exclusivity, Bodily Injury Limitation, Contractual Exclusion Clauses
Civil Procedure Delict Commercial and Corporate International Carriage by Air Warsaw Convention Exclusivity Bodily Injury Limitation Contractual Exclusion Clauses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Neil Vincent Potgieter

Plaintiff

British Airways Plc

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Exception Application / Exception to Particulars of Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does the Warsaw Convention provide the exclusive cause of action and sole remedy for a passenger claiming damages arising out of international carriage by air?
  2. 2 Can a claim for humiliation and impairment of dignity, absent bodily injury, be sustained under South African law in the context of international air carriage?
  3. 3 Is there any constitutional impediment to the exclusivity of the Warsaw Convention in this context?

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Warsaw Convention, as incorporated into South African law, provides the exclusive cause of action and sole remedy for passengers seeking damages arising out of international carriage by air. The Convention limits liability to cases of death, wounding, or bodily injury sustained on board the aircraft or during embarkation or disembarkation. Claims for humiliation, impairment of dignity, or psychological harm, absent bodily injury, are not sustainable under South African law in this context. The court found that the interpretation adopted by the UK House of Lords and the US Supreme Court is congruent with the language and purpose of the Convention and should be...

Court Disposition

Exception upheld. Plaintiff granted leave to amend particulars of claim. Plaintiff ordered to pay costs of the exception, including costs of two counsel.

Orders

  • The exception is upheld.
  • Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his particulars of claim.