Potgieter v Lid van die Uitvoerende Raad: Gesondheid Provinsiale Regering Gauteng en andere (CCT 26/01) [2001] ZACC 4; 2001 (11) BCLR 1175 (8 October 2001)

Potgieter v Lid van die Uitvoerende Raad: Gesondheid Provinsiale Regering Gauteng en andere (CCT 26/01) [2001] ZACC 4; 2001 (11) BCLR 1175 (8 October 2001)

Section 68(4) of the Mental Health Act 18 of 1973 imposes a three-month limitation period for instituting legal proceedings against persons acting under the Act. This limitation is neither adequate nor fair, especially considering the vulnerable category of persons affected. It constitutes a material and unjustifiable restriction of the right of access to courts guaranteed by section 34 of the Constitution. No justification was provided for the limitation, and in light of Constitutional Court precedents, such a drastic restriction cannot be sustained. The High Court's declaration of invalidity is confirmed, with retrospective effect to 27 April 1994, to ensure that all pending proceedings...

Citation
[2001] ZACC 4
Parties
Applicant: Frans Barnard Potgieter; Respondent: Lid van die Uitvoerende Raad: Gesondheid, Provinsiale Regering Gauteng; Respondent: Superintendent, Weskoppies Hospitaal; Respondent: Nasionale Minister van Gesondheid
Court
Constitutional Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
8 October 2001
Case Number
CCT 26/01
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Confirmation / Confirmation of High Court Order of Constitutional Invalidity
Outcome
The order of constitutional invalidity made by the High Court is confirmed, with retrospective effect to 27 April 1994. The respondents are ordered to pay the applicant's costs jointly and severally.
Judges
Skweyiya AJ, Chaskalson P, Ackermann J, Kriegler J, Madala J, Mokgoro J, O'Regan J, Sachs J, Yacoob J, DuPlessis AJ
Legal Topics
Right of Access to Court, Limitation of Actions, Retrospective Invalidity, Mental Health Act, Access to Information
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Delict Right of Access to Court Limitation of Actions Retrospective Invalidity Mental Health Act Access to Information

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frans Barnard Potgieter

Applicant

Lid van die Uitvoerende Raad: Gesondheid, Provinsiale Regering Gauteng

Respondent

Superintendent, Weskoppies Hospitaal

Respondent

Nasionale Minister van Gesondheid

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Confirmation / Confirmation of High Court Order of Constitutional Invalidity

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether section 68(4) of the Mental Health Act 18 of 1973 is unconstitutional for limiting the period to institute legal proceedings to three months.
  2. 2 Whether the limitation imposed by section 68(4) unjustifiably restricts the right of access to courts under section 34 of the Constitution.
  3. 3 Whether the declaration of invalidity should have retrospective effect to 27 April 1994.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 68(4) of the Mental Health Act 18 of 1973 imposes a three-month limitation period for instituting legal proceedings against persons acting under the Act. This limitation is neither adequate nor fair, especially considering the vulnerable category of persons affected. It constitutes a material and unjustifiable restriction of the right of access to courts guaranteed by section 34 of the Constitution. No justification was provided for the limitation, and in light of Constitutional Court precedents, such a drastic restriction cannot be sustained. The High Court's declaration of invalidity is confirmed, with retrospective effect to 27 April 1994, to ensure that all pending proceedings...

Court Disposition

The order of constitutional invalidity made by the High Court is confirmed, with retrospective effect to 27 April 1994. The respondents are ordered to pay the applicant's costs jointly and severally.

Orders

  • Section 68(4) of Act 18 of 1973 is declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid.
  • The declaration of invalidity is retrospective to 27 April 1994 and applies to all pending proceedings instituted before or since that date which have not yet been finally determined by judgment or settlement.