Premier Group (Pty) Ltd v Border Star Bakery (Pty) Ltd and Others (017434) [2013] ZACT 111; [2013] 2 CPLR 557 (CT) (4 November 2013)
The Tribunal found that the merger would not increase the likelihood of coordinated effects despite the history of collusion in the bread industry. Premier's new management and compliance initiatives mitigate the risk of future collusion. The lease arrangement with Pioneer does not provide Pioneer with undue influence over Premier. Foreclosure concerns are unfounded as Premier cannot economically supply flour to the target firms from its mills outside the Eastern Cape, and local supplier Mr Bread will continue to supply the target firms. Public interest concerns regarding retrenchments are not merger-specific and thus do not affect the approval. The merger is approved without conditions.
- Citation
- [2013] ZACT 111
- Parties
- Applicant: Premier Group (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Border Star Bakery (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Border Star Bakery (EP) (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Sikunye Bakery (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Westpat Properties cc
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 November 2013
- Case Number
- 017434
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Approval / Decision on Approval
- Outcome
- Merger approved without conditions.
- Judges
- N Manoim, A Wessels, M Mokuena
- Legal Topics
- Horizontal Merger, Vertical Merger, Coordinated Effects, Foreclosure, Public Interest, Bread Market
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Premier Group (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Border Star Bakery (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Border Star Bakery (EP) (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Sikunye Bakery (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Westpat Properties cc
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Approval / Decision on Approval
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the merger would result in coordinated effects given the history of collusion in the bread industry.
- 2 Whether the merger would lead to foreclosure concerns due to Premier's vertical integration and potential self-supply of flour.
- 3 Whether the merger would have adverse public interest effects, specifically regarding employee retrenchments.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the merger would not increase the likelihood of coordinated effects despite the history of collusion in the bread industry. Premier's new management and compliance initiatives mitigate the risk of future collusion. The lease arrangement with Pioneer does not provide Pioneer with undue influence over Premier. Foreclosure concerns are unfounded as Premier cannot economically supply flour to the target firms from its mills outside the Eastern Cape, and local supplier Mr Bread will continue to supply the target firms. Public interest concerns regarding retrenchments are not merger-specific and thus do not affect the approval. The merger is approved without conditions.
Court Disposition
Merger approved without conditions.
Orders
- The merger between Premier Group (Pty) Ltd and the Eastern Cape Bakeries is approved without conditions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment