Premier: Northern Cape v Gaseemelwe and Others (1043/2007) [2007] ZANCHC 8 (14 December 2007)
The Northern Cape High Court does not have jurisdiction over the chieftainship dispute, as the relevant areas fall judicially under the North West Province and the Bophuthatswana General Division. Consent by the parties cannot confer jurisdiction where none exists. Section 3 of the Interim Rationalisation of Jurisdiction of High Courts Act permits transfer of proceedings to the appropriate High Court even if the transferring court lacks jurisdiction. An oral application for transfer is sufficient in circumstances where all parties are aware of the jurisdictional defect and have had an opportunity to address the issue. The rule nisi must be discharged as it was issued without jurisdiction....
- Citation
- [2007] ZANCHC 8
- Parties
- Applicant: Premier: Northern Cape; Applicant: Kgosi KS Motshwarakgole; Respondent: LA Gaseemelwe; Respondent: MM Gaseemelwe; Respondent: SH Gaborewe; Respondent: G Gaborewe; Respondent: R Gaogatwe; Respondent: P Gorewang; Respondent: S Thibogang; Respondent: MS Mosala; Respondent: L Boihang; Respondent: DG Ntlhaile
- Court
- Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2007
- Case Number
- 1043/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Return Day of Rule Nisi; Application for Confirmation of Interim Interdict and Transfer of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application for confirmation of interim interdict refused; rule nisi discharged; matter transferred to Bophuthatswana General Division; costs awarded against applicants.
- Judges
- MAJIEDT
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of High Courts, Transfer of Proceedings, Chieftainship Dispute, Interim Interdict
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Premier: Northern Cape
Applicant
Kgosi KS Motshwarakgole
Applicant
LA Gaseemelwe
Respondent
MM Gaseemelwe
Respondent
SH Gaborewe
Respondent
G Gaborewe
Respondent
R Gaogatwe
Respondent
P Gorewang
Respondent
S Thibogang
Respondent
MS Mosala
Respondent
L Boihang
Respondent
DG Ntlhaile
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Return Day of Rule Nisi; Application for Confirmation of Interim Interdict and Transfer of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Northern Cape High Court have jurisdiction over the chieftainship dispute?
- 2 Is consent by the parties sufficient to confer jurisdiction on the court?
- 3 Should the matter be transferred to the Bophuthatswana General Division under section 3 of the Interim Rationalisation of Jurisdiction of High Courts Act?
Ratio Decidendi
The Northern Cape High Court does not have jurisdiction over the chieftainship dispute, as the relevant areas fall judicially under the North West Province and the Bophuthatswana General Division. Consent by the parties cannot confer jurisdiction where none exists. Section 3 of the Interim Rationalisation of Jurisdiction of High Courts Act permits transfer of proceedings to the appropriate High Court even if the transferring court lacks jurisdiction. An oral application for transfer is sufficient in circumstances where all parties are aware of the jurisdictional defect and have had an opportunity to address the issue. The rule nisi must be discharged as it was issued without jurisdiction....
Court Disposition
Application for confirmation of interim interdict refused; rule nisi discharged; matter transferred to Bophuthatswana General Division; costs awarded against applicants.
Orders
- The rule nisi issued on 24 August 2007 is discharged.
- In terms of section 3 of the Interim Rationalisation of Jurisdiction of High Courts Act, 41 of 2001, this matter is transferred to the Bophuthatswana General Division of the High Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment