President Insurance Company Ltd. v Jonker (322/89) [1990] ZASCA 89 (13 September 1990)

President Insurance Company Ltd. v Jonker (322/89) [1990] ZASCA 89 (13 September 1990)

The court found that although the applicant's prospects of success on appeal were substantial, the amount in issue was relatively small and the matter was not of particular importance. The applicant had been guilty of a long and unexplained delay in prosecuting the appeal, having failed to take active steps to lodge the necessary documents within the prescribed timeframes. The court weighed these factors and concluded that condonation should not be granted. The respondent successfully opposed the application and was entitled to her costs.

Citation
[1990] ZASCA 89
Parties
Applicant: President Insurance Company Limited; Respondent: Anna Catharina Jonker
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 September 1990
Case Number
322/89
Procedural Posture
Condonation Application / Application for Condonation of Late Filing of Appeal Documents
Outcome
Application for condonation dismissed with costs.
Judges
E M Grosskopf, Nestadt, Steyn
Legal Topics
Condonation, Late Filing of Appeal, Prospects of Success, Delay in Prosecution
Civil Procedure Condonation Late Filing of Appeal Prospects of Success Delay in Prosecution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

President Insurance Company Limited

Applicant

Anna Catharina Jonker

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Condonation Application / Application for Condonation of Late Filing of Appeal Documents

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether condonation should be granted for the late lodging of the power of attorney, security for costs, and the record of proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's delay in prosecuting the appeal is justified.
  3. 3 Whether the prospects of success on appeal warrant condonation despite the delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the applicant's prospects of success on appeal were substantial, the amount in issue was relatively small and the matter was not of particular importance. The applicant had been guilty of a long and unexplained delay in prosecuting the appeal, having failed to take active steps to lodge the necessary documents within the prescribed timeframes. The court weighed these factors and concluded that condonation should not be granted. The respondent successfully opposed the application and was entitled to her costs.

Court Disposition

Application for condonation dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for condonation is dismissed.
  • The applicant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs.