President Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk. v Biggs (455/90) [1992] ZASCA 151 (17 September 1992)

President Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk. v Biggs (455/90) [1992] ZASCA 151 (17 September 1992)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court's findings on the credibility of the respondent's witnesses, particularly Mong and Biggs, were strongly supported by their demeanour and the consistency of their evidence. The appellant failed to demonstrate any misdirection or error in the trial court's approach to the evidence or the probabilities. The court found that the physical evidence did not contradict the respondent's version and that the trial court was justified in preferring the respondent's witnesses over the appellant's. The appeal was dismissed, and the trial court's finding of liability against the appellant was upheld.

Citation
[1992] ZASCA 151
Parties
Appellant: President Versekeringsmaatskappy Beperk; Respondent: F G Biggs
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
17 September 1992
Case Number
455/90
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Transvaal Provincial Division on Liability for Damages
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of applications for leave to appeal in both the trial court and the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges
Eksteen, Hoexter, Vivier, F H Grosskopf, Van Coller
Legal Topics
Negligence, Assessment of Evidence, Credibility of Witnesses
Delict Negligence Assessment of Evidence Credibility of Witnesses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

President Versekeringsmaatskappy Beperk

Appellant

F G Biggs

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Transvaal Provincial Division on Liability for Damages

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial court correctly found the appellant liable in delict for damages arising from the motor vehicle collision.
  2. 2 Whether the trial court's credibility findings regarding the witnesses should be disturbed on appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the physical evidence and probabilities support the respondent's version of the accident.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court's findings on the credibility of the respondent's witnesses, particularly Mong and Biggs, were strongly supported by their demeanour and the consistency of their evidence. The appellant failed to demonstrate any misdirection or error in the trial court's approach to the evidence or the probabilities. The court found that the physical evidence did not contradict the respondent's version and that the trial court was justified in preferring the respondent's witnesses over the appellant's. The appeal was dismissed, and the trial court's finding of liability against the appellant was upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of applications for leave to appeal in both the trial court and the Supreme Court of Appeal.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.
  • Costs include those of the application before the trial court for leave to appeal and the costs of the petition to this Court for such leave.